WikiFX

Rispondi

As an experienced trader who places high value on transparency and regulation, I always want to understand the fee structure of any broker I consider working with. For MBKET, I examined the available information thoroughly but found no direct or specific mention of inactivity fees in their publicly disclosed materials. This lack of detail is important because, in my experience, reputable and regulated brokers usually outline such fees clearly in their terms or FAQs. MBKET operates without valid regulation and is flagged as high-risk, which means vital information like fee schedules may not be as accessible, transparent, or standardized as with regulated competitors. Given that MBKET is unregulated and there are warnings regarding its risk level, my cautious approach prompts me to assume there could be hidden costs or fees—potentially including inactivity fees—that may not be immediately apparent until one opens an account or reads through client agreements in detail. For me, this lack of clarity is a significant red flag. Without regulation, there's little external oversight ensuring fair disclosure. If inactivity fees matter for your trading style or you plan to have dormant periods on your account, I recommend you seek written clarification from their customer support before proceeding. I find that a conservative and careful approach is essential when assessing a broker with such a risk profile and incomplete disclosures, especially regarding any possible fees attached to account inactivity.