WikiFX

Rispondi

From my perspective as an experienced forex trader, I approach brokers like fxonet with a high level of caution, especially given the critical information available. It is important to note that fxonet currently has no valid regulatory status and is flagged with a high potential risk score. Based on my previous interactions with similarly unregulated brokers, the document requirements for initial withdrawals can be unpredictable, and may even be intentionally complicated. Usually, with most brokers, the required documents for the first withdrawal include proof of identity (such as a passport or driver’s license), proof of address (like a utility bill or bank statement), and potentially proof of payment method (credit card copy or bank statement for the funding account). However, my concern is that with a broker showing several red flags—such as suspicious regulation claims and repeated warnings—these document requests may not serve purely for compliance, but could be used to introduce delays or additional hurdles. In my judgment, the lack of regulatory oversight with fxonet means there is no external authority to guarantee your withdrawal requests will be handled according to industry standards. Before proceeding, I would ensure all submitted documents have sensitive data protected as much as possible, and I would be prepared for the possibility that even full compliance offers no assurance of withdrawal success. I cannot emphasize enough how important it is for me to only submit documents that are necessary and never to proceed if anything seems suspicious or inconsistent.