WikiFX

Rispondi

As an independent trader with many years of experience evaluating brokers, I am always cautious when dealing with firms that have limited transparency or carry regulatory uncertainties. In my research and careful examination of the available information about MEKSA, I found that there is a notable lack of publicly disclosed details regarding account fees—specifically, the presence or absence of inactivity fees. The broker does not make specifics about fee structures, including inactivity fees, easily accessible on its website or within reliable third-party reviews. In my own practice, I place great importance on clarity around such operational costs, as undisclosed or unexpected charges can materially affect trading outcomes. The absence of clear information on inactivity fees at MEKSA leaves a gap that could present unforeseen risks for both active and less frequent traders. In my experience, when a broker does not communicate its fee policies openly—especially in a context where regulatory protection is lacking—it warrants an extra degree of caution. Given MEKSA’s unregulated status and the limited fee transparency, I would be very careful when considering this broker. Anyone contemplating opening an account should contact customer service directly and request written, up-to-date documentation regarding all possible fees, including inactivity fees, before depositing any funds. This approach helps avoid unpleasant surprises and supports sound risk management, which is central to responsible trading.