WikiFX

Rispondi

From my personal experience and after a careful assessment of the information available, I couldn't find any specific details about inactivity fees for PAXOS. The broker does not publicly disclose clear policies or terms regarding inactivity charges, at least not in readily accessible documentation. This absence of transparency makes it difficult to determine whether such fees exist or under what conditions they might be applied. As someone who values regulatory oversight and clear, upfront fee structures, I am always cautious when a provider lacks well-documented policies. PAXOS, in particular, is not regulated by recognized financial authorities such as the FCA, ASIC, or CySEC, which heightens my concerns. In my view, a trustworthy and client-focused broker should clearly outline all possible charges, including those related to inactivity, to ensure traders can make informed decisions and avoid unexpected costs. Given reports of withdrawal issues and user complaints about frozen funds, the lack of clarity regarding inactivity fees adds another layer of risk. Personally, I would not feel comfortable trading with a platform unless all potential expenses and terms are fully transparent and reliably enforced under recognized regulation. For anyone considering PAXOS, I strongly recommend reaching out directly to their customer support for the most up-to-date and official policy information, and exercising additional caution until clear answers are provided.