WikiFX

Sagot

From my experience evaluating brokers, it’s crucial to be fully aware of all trading costs, especially when considering indices like the US100. In the case of IFC, what stands out immediately for me is the notable lack of regulatory oversight. There is no information from recognized regulatory bodies about their fee structures or cost transparency. That means, as a trader, I can’t independently verify spreads, commission rates, or any additional charges such as overnight swaps or withdrawal fees specific to index CFDs like the US100. IFC does mention offering financial brokerage and margin financing, and their platform supports spot trading; however, the absence of published cost details for trading indices raises concern for me. In my personal trading practice, I never proceed with a broker unless every component of trading cost—spread, commission, potential slippage, and rollover—is explicitly stated and can be confirmed through authoritative channels. With IFC, the unregulated status combined with a suspicious regulatory license warning presents a significant barrier to trusting any cost estimate they might provide. I strongly advise prospective traders to approach this broker with great caution. For me, clear, independently verified trading costs are non-negotiable, especially for high-volume indices trading. In this environment, I could not confidently calculate or recommend trusting their fee structure for US100 or any other index.