天眼评分
NFS
http://nfseurope.com/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
D
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
持牌机构:NFS Network Financial Services Ltd
监管证号:328/17
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到1条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 NFS 的用户还浏览了..
VT Markets
Vantage
官网鉴定
nfseurope.com
89.234.45.0服务器所在地英国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| NFS 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2016 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 监管 | CYSEC监管 |
| 市场工具 | 股票、单位信托、投资信托、资本投资债券和交易所交易基金 |
| 模拟账户 | / |
| 交易平台 | 投资平台 |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客户支持 | 联系表单 |
| 电话:+ 357 25 817 747 | |
| 电子邮件:enquiries@nfseurope.com | |
| 地址:利马索尔市市政厅,塞浦路斯 | |
| 区域限制 | 仅向欧盟客户提供服务 |
NFS 是一家总部位于塞浦路斯的机构,从欧盟运营,并提供投资咨询服务。其服务涉及储蓄投资、股票等领域。目前在CYSEC监管下运营。
这是该经纪商官方网站的首页:

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| CYSEC监管 | 仅向欧盟客户提供服务 |
| 多样的交易产品 | 有关交易的信息有限 |
| 有关账户的信息有限 |
NFS 是否合法?
遵守塞浦路斯证券交易委员会(CYSEC)的法律监督,NFS,持有NO. 328/17许可,证明了他们在交易服务中的值得信赖和遵守监管准则。NFS声称自己是您和您选择的产品提供商之间的中介,但不处理客户资金。NFS只会推荐在欧盟境内受监管的产品提供商。
| 监管状态 | 已监管 |
| 监管机构 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 许可机构 | NFS Network Financial Services Ltd |
| 许可类型 | 指定代表(AR) |
| 许可号码 | 328/17 |

我可以在NFS上交易什么?
NFS 提供股票、单位信托、投资信托、资本投资债券和交易所交易基金(ETFs)。此外,还提供包括储蓄和投资、集体投资以及离岸集体投资在内的咨询建议。
| 交易工具 | 支持 |
| 股票 | ✔ |
| 信托 | ✔ |
| 债券 | ✔ |
| ETFs | ✔ |
| 外汇 | ❌ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 指数 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密货币 | ❌ |
| 期权 | ❌ |
交易平台
NFS 提供投资平台。通过您的在线账户,您可以全天候访问实时估值。您还可以随时通过进行转换和交易来调整您的投资组合。
拥有一个统一的投资门户和对整个投资组合的全面视图,使您和您的NFS顾问能够简单评估和监控您的投资情况。

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 塞浦路斯监管
- 授权代表(AR)
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Which deposit and withdrawal payment options are available with NFS, such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrency?
Based on the information provided, I was unable to find any clear, detailed explanation from NFS regarding the specific deposit and withdrawal methods available, such as credit cards, PayPal, Skrill, or cryptocurrency. As an experienced trader, I always prioritize full transparency in fund handling—knowing the precise options for deposits and withdrawals is essential for assessing a broker's suitability and operational trustworthiness. The fact that NFS does not clearly disclose these details raises questions for me, especially given that managing client money is a core area where trust is paramount. Additionally, NFS’s stated business model highlights that the company acts as an intermediary between clients and regulated product providers, and claims not to handle client funds directly. This is an important distinction, as it means that traditional payment options often associated with direct account deposits—such as credit cards or e-wallets—may not even be handled directly through NFS. In my experience, when the broker does not hold client money, the process for funding and withdrawals tends to rely on arrangements with third parties, which can sometimes result in additional delays or complications. In summary, due to the limited and vague information about payment methods, I would encourage potential clients to exercise caution and seek direct clarification from NFS regarding how funds are moved in and out, as well as what specific options are available. For me, unless all payment options and security measures are clearly stated, I am hesitant to proceed—especially with any firm flagged for high potential risk or operational ambiguity.
Can you outline the particular advantages NFS offers in terms of its available trading instruments and how its fee structure is organized?
In my experience reviewing brokers, the main advantage NFS offers lies in its specialized range of regulated investment instruments rather than broad traditional trading products. NFS is regulated under CYSEC as an Appointed Representative, and while that gives some reassurance regarding oversight and compliance with EU financial rules, I urge caution and always recommend independently verifying regulatory status. Their offering includes equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs. There is no forex, commodities, indices, or cryptocurrency trading available—this focused lineup could be attractive for those specifically seeking diversified, regulated investment products within the EU, but unsuitable for forex or derivative traders. Regarding fees, the publicly available information is quite limited. I could not find clear disclosures on commission rates, spreads, or account maintenance costs. In my view, the lack of transparent fee structure details makes it difficult to assess the cost competitiveness of NFS. This absence of critical cost information raises questions about ongoing charges or potential hidden fees, which is particularly important to clarify given their role as intermediaries rather than direct fund managers. Ultimately, while the advantage with NFS is the access to EU-regulated instruments under a CYSEC framework, the narrow product range and opaque fee structure require cautious due diligence. For anyone considering NFS, I would strongly advise reaching out directly to request comprehensive, written details on all charges before any commitment is made. This kind of proactive approach has been important for me in safeguarding my capital and ensuring a clear understanding of my total costs as an investor.
Based on your own experience, what do you consider the three biggest benefits of using NFS?
Reflecting on my experience with NFS, I find that its regulatory status under CYSEC stands out as one of the key advantages. In the world of trading and investment advisory, especially within the EU framework, this oversight provides a foundation of trust for me, as rigorous supervision reduces the probability of misconduct and ensures adherence to established standards. Additionally, NFS's role is specifically as an appointed representative, meaning it acts as an intermediary and does not itself handle client funds. For me, this separation further mitigates certain risks and reassures me that my money isn't being directly exposed to the broker's operational risks. Another benefit I've experienced is the variety of regulated investment products accessible through NFS—including equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs. From a portfolio diversification standpoint, this breadth is valuable, especially since NFS gathers only regulated product providers within the EU, which aligns with my preference for transparency and compliance in the products I access. Lastly, NFS's commitment to providing clients with real-time access to their portfolio, along with the ability to adjust or switch investments online, has improved my sense of control and oversight. While NFS's services are narrower in scope—without forex, commodities, or crypto—I see this simplicity as a benefit for investors focused on traditional, supervised instruments. Conservative investors like myself may find this focused approach reassuring. However, I remain mindful of highlighted risks and recommend ongoing vigilance, especially due to the flagged "suspicious scope of business" and the limitation to European clients.
Does NFS charge a commission per lot on their ECN or raw spread account types?
Based on my independent evaluation and the information presented about NFS, I cannot confirm that NFS charges commissions per lot on ECN or raw spread account types. In fact, my research indicates that NFS does not operate as a traditional forex or CFD broker offering ECN or raw spread accounts. Instead, NFS appears to function primarily as an investment consultancy, delivering access to equities, unit trusts, investment trusts, capital investment bonds, and ETFs rather than typical spot forex or leveraged trading instruments. From my perspective, this is a substantial distinction. Traders accustomed to standard forex brokerage models that publish transparent commission structures—where it’s common to see a per-lot commission on ECN accounts—should not expect the same structure here. The company does not handle client funds directly, and its disclosures around account types and transaction costs are minimal. This lack of detailed information around typical trading fees is a red flag for me as someone who values transparency. Furthermore, the stated “suspicious scope of business” and “high potential risk” warnings, along with the observation that their regulatory standing is an appointed representative under CYSEC and not a full-scope dealing license, give me pause. For traders seeking straightforward cost disclosures and a more robust forex or CFD trading environment, I would proceed cautiously and seek full clarification from NFS directly before considering account opening or any trading activity.
你要评价的内容
请输入...
