天眼评分
Fortex · 方达科技
https://www.fortex.com/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
C
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
暂未查证到有效监管信息,请注意风险!
- 经查证,该交易商当前暂无有效外汇监管,请注意风险!
浏览 Fortex 方达科技 的用户还浏览了..
EC Markets
fpmarkets
AVATRADE
CPT Markets
官网鉴定
fortex.com
52.42.120.14服务器所在地美国
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间2001-08-07网站名称WHOIS.NETWORKSOLUTIONS.COM所属公司NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| 方达科技评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 1997 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 美国 |
| 监管 | 无监管 |
| 产品 | MT4/5 Bridge OMX,方达科技 XCloud,方达科技 ECN解决方案,方达科技 7和AlgoX |
| 客户支持 | 在线聊天,联系表单 |
| 电话:650.591.8822 | |
| 传真:650.591.8818 | |
| 电子邮件:info@fortex.com,support@fortex.com | |
| 社交媒体:Twitter,LinkedIn,Facebook,YouTube | |
| 硅谷总部:Palo Alto Square,3000 El Camino Real,Building 4,Suite 200,Palo Alto,CA 94306,美国 | |
| 其他分支机构的联系信息:https://www.fortex.com/en/con | |
方达科技信息
方达科技总部位于硅谷,是一家技术提供商,为客户提供中间件、应用程序接口和丰富的交易咨询、分析和定制服务,以及桌面、网络或移动交易的终端用户应用程序。
然而,该经纪商目前没有有效的监管,这降低了其合法性和可靠性。

优点和缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 多年行业经验 | 无监管 |
| 在线聊天支持 | |
| 多种联系渠道 |
监管状况
监管是评估经纪公司合法性和可靠性的重要方面,在方达科技的情况下,该经纪商没有任何有效的监管监督。缺乏监管框架引发了对经纪商遵守行业标准、财务透明度和保护客户利益的巨大关注。

产品与服务
作为金融公司的技术提供商,方达科技为全球的交易者、经纪商、流动性提供商、资金管理人、银行、对冲基金和投资者提供广泛的技术解决方案服务,并拥有自己的产品列表。
流动性访问
方达科技 Bridge OMX通过Equinix NY4、HK1和LD4设施将MT4/5交易者连接到全球流动性提供商,确保亚1毫秒的往返交易时间和对深度流动性池的无缝访问。

低延迟
基础设施方达科技 XCloud通过专用数据中心提供高频率、低延迟的连接,实现与一流流动性提供商的数千个并发订单的高效执行。

交易平台
方达科技 ECN平台,包括方达科技 7和AlgoX,提供了一个全面的套件,用于交易货币、商品、差价合约和股票,具有用户友好的界面和强大的算法交易能力。

全面解决方案
方达科技整合了全球流动性聚合、基于云的基础设施和先进的交易引擎,为最完整的多资产ECN交易生态系统提供了解决方案。

企业画像
- 5-10年
- 监管牌照存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Is a free demo account available with Fortex, and if so, are there any restrictions, such as a time limit on its use?
Based on my close review of Fortex, I did not find any explicit mention of a free demo account or its specific restrictions, such as time limits, within the available information. While Fortex positions itself primarily as a technology provider rather than a conventional retail broker, it does offer platforms like Fortex 7 and AlgoX and provides trading infrastructure to various clients in the industry. In my experience, most reputable brokers make their demo account policies transparent by clearly stating if and how traders can simulate live trading with virtual funds. The absence of a clearly advertised free demo account at Fortex is something I regard as a potential drawback, especially for those who value transparency and risk management when testing new platforms or strategies. Given their unregulated status and the high-risk warning attached to Fortex, I am particularly cautious about engaging with any service that does not lay out its demo trading conditions in detail. Without regulatory oversight, it is essential to have all relevant terms—demo or live—fully disclosed. Personally, I expect clear, accessible information regarding demo accounts as part of a broker or platform’s commitment to customer experience and financial safety. Until I could confirm the details directly from Fortex, I would not assume a free, unrestricted demo environment is available for prospective users. For me, this lack of clarity contributes significantly to my overall risk assessment of the provider.
What would you identify as the primary advantages and disadvantages of trading through Fortex?
Based on my experience and after closely examining Fortex, I find the evaluation complex and it requires caution, especially when making decisions about where to entrust my trading capital. A clear advantage for me is Fortex’s technological offering—its suite of ECN trading platforms, including Fortex 7 and AlgoX, plus direct liquidity access and low-latency infrastructure, stand out as sophisticated features designed for both high-frequency and algorithmic trading. Over the years, this kind of tech focus has often translated to faster executions and potentially lower trading costs, both important for my strategy. However, the absence of any valid regulatory oversight is, in my judgment, a critical drawback. Regulation exists not just as a bureaucratic requirement, but to uphold transparency, protect client interests, and provide recourse in the case of disputes or broker failures. With Fortex lacking such oversight, I am left without assurance regarding the segregation of client funds, dispute resolution, or adherence to industry standards. User experiences seem mixed—some describe stable conditions and satisfactory performance, while others raise serious concerns over trade execution integrity and insufficient customer support. In short, while the technical infrastructure might appeal to advanced traders like myself, the regulatory gap represents a significant risk I cannot overlook. Personally, I would approach trading with Fortex very cautiously, prioritizing safety and capital protection above all else.
How do Fortex’s swap fees for overnight positions stack up against those charged by other brokers?
Assessing Fortex’s overnight swap fees compared to other brokers is challenging, as the available information doesn’t clearly specify their fee structure for holding positions overnight. In my experience as a trader, the transparency and competitiveness of swap rates are very important; established and regulated brokers typically make these details public and easily accessible. However, with Fortex, not only is there a lack of regulation—raising my personal caution levels—but there’s also limited data on their actual trading costs, including swap fees. From what I could gather, Fortex is positioned more as a technology provider and liquidity bridge than a client-facing retail broker, which complicates direct swaps comparisons. Most of the industry’s reputable brokers list their overnight financing costs clearly, helping me to calculate my long-term trade expenses and risk management. The absence of publicly available swap rate information from Fortex would force me to reach out directly to their team or possibly even open an account just to access these details, which is far from ideal for informed decision-making. Ultimately, because I place heavy emphasis on transparency and regulatory oversight—especially when it comes to any fees that can erode trading profits over time—I would be very cautious about engaging with a broker that does not disclose its swap fees upfront or is not regulated. For me, this makes it impossible to confidently compare Fortex’s swap costs with those of more established brokers.
Would it be safe and reliable to trade with Fortex as my broker?
In my experience as a trader, the first thing I look for in any broker is robust regulatory oversight. With Fortex, this is immediately a concern—there is no valid regulation in place according to all available data. For me, this is a significant red flag because regulation is not simply a bureaucratic formality; it’s an essential safeguard for trader funds and a mechanism to hold brokers accountable to fair practices. Operating without supervision undermines a broker’s credibility, raises questions about financial transparency, and, most importantly, complicates recourse for clients in the event of disputes or issues with execution. While Fortex has an established presence in the industry and offers sophisticated technology solutions and fast order execution, none of this can replace the protection that legitimate oversight provides. My exposure to unregulated entities, even those with innovative platforms or positive user feedback, has always been overshadowed by the increased risks—especially when it comes to withdrawal and dispute resolution. There are also neutral and negative user reports that echo concerns such as trade manipulation and lack of effective customer service. In my view, these should not be taken lightly, since real-time communication and transparency are critical when problems arise. To sum up, based on what I know and what I value as a trader—security of funds, dispute protection, and regulatory transparency—I would not consider Fortex a safe or reliable choice for trading. The risks associated with their unregulated status are too significant for my comfort.
用户评价 3
你要评价的内容
请输入...

