天眼評分
FX Connect
https://www.fxconnect.com/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽FX Connect 的用戶還瀏覽了..
fpmarkets
CPT Markets
官網鑒定
fxconnect.com
208.89.235.202伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| FX Connect 評論摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2003 |
| 註冊地區 | 英國 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 服務 | 執行靈活性、結算解決方案、交易報告、工作流管理 |
| 模擬帳戶 | ✅ |
| 平台/應用程式 | TradeNeXusSM |
| 客戶支援 | Contact form |
| 電話:+44 203-395-7864、+852 2978-9202 | |
| 地址:20 Churchill Palce, Canary Wharf, London E14 5HJ, England | |
| 香港中環金融街8號國際金融中心 | |
FX Connect,成立於2003年,是一家位於英國的無監管金融公司。提供各種金融服務,包括執行靈活性、結算解決方案、交易報告和工作流管理,並設有模擬帳戶。支援TradeNeXusSM平台。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 提供模擬帳戶 | 無監管 |
| 提供多種服務 | |
| 多元客戶支援渠道 |
FX Connect 是否合法?

目前,FX Connect 缺乏有效監管。其域名於2003年1月22日註冊,目前狀態為“客戶刪除禁止、客戶轉移禁止、客戶更新禁止”。如果選擇此經紀商,請特別注意您資金的安全。

FX Connect 服務
FX Connect 為客戶提供金融服務,包括執行靈活性、結算解決方案、交易報告和工作流管理。

交易平台
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 |
| TradeNeXusSM | ✔ | Web |

企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Can you tell me the typical spread for EUR/USD when using a standard account on FX Connect?
Based on my careful review and personal experience in this industry, I could not locate any transparent or official data regarding the typical spread for EUR/USD with a standard account on FX Connect. For me, this immediately raises some caution: reputable brokers usually make this information freely available, as spread transparency is critical for managing trading costs and making informed decisions. What stands out to me is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid regulatory oversight. This lack of regulation means there is no trustworthy third party verifying their pricing or ensuring fair dealing. In my view, without proper regulation, any claims about tight spreads or competitive trading conditions lack meaningful external validation, which is a significant risk factor. Given these circumstances, I approached this question with particular caution. If an unregulated broker does not disclose their EUR/USD spread structure directly, I would personally consider this a red flag. As a trader, I insist on full clarity before ever risking funds. Without published spreads or regulatory safeguards, it is impossible for me to make an evidence-based recommendation regarding their costs or competitiveness. I would advise extreme caution and, if transparency around such core trading conditions cannot be obtained, consider alternative brokers with clear disclosure and robust regulatory status.
What are the key advantages and disadvantages of using FX Connect for trading?
Drawing from my own experience as a forex trader, evaluating FX Connect presents a number of clear considerations. One positive aspect is the availability of demo accounts, which for me has always been essential in assessing a broker's platform and services without risking real capital. The broad suite of services, including execution flexibility and workflow management, seems theoretically attractive, particularly for those who prioritize operational support in addition to pure trading execution. However, for me, the most significant and concerning drawback is that FX Connect currently operates without any valid financial regulation. As someone who values capital security above all, trading with an unregulated broker introduces unacceptable risks. From my perspective, this lack of oversight means there is no assurance that client funds are protected or that operational practices meet industry standards. The platform offered, TradeNeXusSM, is also fairly specialized and less widely known than industry staples like MT4 or MT5, so I would approach it with caution, especially since information about its functionality in a trading context appears limited. Overall, while customer support appears accessible and a demo account is available, I cannot comfortably recommend trading real funds with FX Connect due to the regulatory gap. For me, security and compliance are non-negotiable, especially in an industry as fraught with risk as forex trading.
How do the different account types available on FX Connect compare to each other?
From my experience analyzing FX Connect, I found their account type offerings rather unclear, which is concerning from a trader’s perspective. FX Connect emphasizes services such as execution flexibility, settlement solutions, and workflow management, and they do provide a demo account, which allowed me to test their platform without committing real funds. However, there is no transparent information about distinct live account types—such as Standard, ECN, or VIP—nor about specific trading conditions tied to them like spreads, commissions, or margin requirements. This lack of clear account differentiation makes it difficult for traders like me to compare options or tailor my trading approach. In regulated brokers, these differences are often critical, as account types define risk exposure, costs, and even platform access. The only consistent offering I could confirm was access to the TradeNeXusSM platform and the ability to use a demo account. On top of that, FX Connect is completely unregulated and carries high potential risk labels. This, combined with insufficient transparency around account types, leads me to be very cautious. Personally, as someone responsible for safeguarding my capital, the absence of both clear regulatory oversight and fully disclosed account structures means I would not feel confident using FX Connect for live trading. For risk-conscious traders, this is a notable drawback.
Have you encountered any drawbacks related to FX Connect's platform stability or their customer support services?
Given my experience as a forex trader, I place a high priority on platform stability and reliable customer support—both of which play significant roles in safeguarding my trading activities. When examining FX Connect, I proceed with considerable caution due to their status as an unregulated broker, as highlighted in their background. The lack of regulation alone raises critical concerns about the level of oversight and recourse available should something go wrong, so I approach any potential engagement with heightened scrutiny. Regarding platform stability, FX Connect utilizes TradeNeXusSM as its trading platform. While they promote execution flexibility and various reporting features, I cannot independently verify the robustness or uptime of their system based on publicly available, regulated benchmarks. In my mindset, the absence of regulatory audits introduces uncertainty; unregulated brokers may not be held to the same operational standards, making unexpected outages or unresolved technical issues a real risk. For a trader like myself, this uncertainty can directly impact my confidence in executing time-sensitive trades. On the customer support front, while FX Connect offers multiple contact channels, I remain reserved in my expectations. In unregulated settings, the quality and timeliness of support can vary greatly, and I’m mindful that escalation paths may be limited or ambiguous if disputes arise. Though there is a positive user review referencing helpful and knowledgeable staff, I don’t consider one testimonial sufficient to mitigate the fundamental risks I see due to lack of external oversight. Overall, while FX Connect offers an appealing range of services and a demo account for testing, the combination of unregulated status and unverified platform or support standards means I would exercise significant caution. My advice is always to thoroughly test any broker’s reliability before exposure to live funds, especially in the absence of regulatory protection.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
