天眼評分
Instreet
http://www.instreet.com.au/
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
持牌機構:Instreet Investment Limited
監管證號:434776
單核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 該交易商WikiFX實勘差評已達到1條,請注意風險,謹防受害!
瀏覽Instreet 的用戶還瀏覽了..
IC Markets Global
fpmarkets
PU Prime
官網鑒定
instreet.com.au
162.241.226.175伺服器所在地美國
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
關係族譜
相關企業
公司簡介
| Instreet 檢討摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 2002 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 澳洲 |
| 監管 | ASIC |
| 市場工具 | 衍生品、期權、指數、ETFs |
| 模擬帳戶 | ❌ |
| 槓桿 | / |
| 點差 | / |
| 交易平台 | / |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客戶支援 | 聯絡表格 |
| 電話:+61 1300 954 678 | |
| 電郵:info@instreet.com.au | |
| X:https://x.com/gl_instreet | |
| YouTube:https://www.youtube.com/user/gsmhlucas | |
| LinkedIn:https://www.linkedin.com/in/gslucas | |
Instreet 資訊
Instreet 是一家受監管的金融服務提供商,提供結構性產品,如 Instreet Masti S&P500 和 Instreet Masti S&P/ASX200 等。Instreet 還為複雜投資者提供定期收入選擇和量身定制的解決方案。通過其知識中心,提供涵蓋各種投資主題的教育資源。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| ASIC 監管 | 沒有模擬帳戶 |
| 多元化的投資解決方案 | 有關交易條件的信息有限 |
| 多種聯絡渠道 | |
| 全面的投資者教育資源 |
Instreet 是否合法?
Yes. Instreet 獲得澳大利亞證券及投資委員會(ASIC)頒發牌照,以直通處理(STP)模式運作,牌照號碼為434776。
| 監管機構 | 當前狀態 | 持牌實體 | 監管國家 | 牌照類型 | 牌照號碼 |
| 澳大利亞證券及投資委員會(ASIC) | 受監管 | Instreet Investment Limited | 澳大利亞 | 直通處理(STP) | 434776 |


我可以在Instreet上交易什麼?
| 可交易資產 | 支援 |
| 衍生品 | ✔ |
| 期權 | ✔ |
| 指數 | ✔ |
| 交易所交易基金(ETFs) | ✔ |
| 外匯 | ❌ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密貨幣 | ❌ |
| 債券 | ❌ |

企業畫像
- 10-15年
- 澳大利亞監管
- 直通牌照(STP)
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Is a free demo account available with Instreet, and if so, are there any restrictions such as a time limit?
In my assessment of Instreet, I found that, unlike many platforms I’ve evaluated over the years, they do not offer a free demo account. For me, this presents a notable limitation, especially for traders who rely on demo environments to familiarize themselves with a broker’s products and interface before committing real capital. In my own trading journey, the absence of a demo account means I can’t test their offering firsthand or gauge essential elements like execution speed, spread, or platform stability without putting my funds at risk. I consider this particularly important given Instreet’s focus on structured products, derivatives, and options—areas that can carry significant complexity and risk. Without a demo environment, practicing these products or evaluating risk-management features is not possible in a risk-free setting. There is also no indication from my research that Instreet provides demo access with any time limitation or with unrestricted features. Given the lack of transparency around trading conditions and the absence of a practice account, I feel it’s essential to approach trading with Instreet cautiously, especially if you value the opportunity to assess a broker’s suitability before making a financial commitment. For me, this factor would weigh heavily in my broker selection process.
In what ways does Instreet’s regulatory status help safeguard my funds?
From my experience as a trader, the regulatory status of a broker is one of the first things I check before entrusting them with my funds. Instreet is licensed under the Australia Securities & Investment Commission (ASIC), which is generally regarded as a rigorous regulator. ASIC’s role is to set and enforce standards designed to ensure licensed financial service providers adhere to fair practices, including capital adequacy, segregation of client money, and transparent reporting. For me, this kind of oversight means that Instreet must follow strict operational guidelines, which in theory helps minimize the risks of mismanagement or misuse of client funds. However, while ASIC regulation is reassuring, it’s important to note that no regulatory framework offers complete protection, and investors still need to practice due diligence. I also noticed that WikiFX flags a "suspicious scope of business" and a "high potential risk" at Instreet, and this kind of warning increases my caution. Regulated status, therefore, is just a foundation; it does foster more accountability and transparency, but it doesn’t eliminate all risks related to trading. This is why I always recommend maintaining a cautious approach, especially in environments where certain red flags have been noted.
Can you tell me the highest leverage Instreet provides on major forex pairs, and how does that differ for other types of assets?
As an experienced trader, when I examined Instreet, I specifically looked for clear information about leverage offered on major forex pairs—since leverage is a crucial risk factor in our industry. However, based on my careful review of Instreet's disclosures, I could not find any mention that they offer trading in forex pairs at all. Instead, Instreet appears to focus on structured products, derivatives, options, indices, and ETFs. There is no available detail about leverage for major forex pairs or, in fact, any leverage specifications for other asset types on their platform. For me, this lack of transparency around product specifications and leverage is a significant concern. In my own trading decisions, I prioritize brokers who explicitly state margin requirements and leverage limits for each instrument. Not only does this help manage risk, but it is also a sign of clarity and professionalism. While it's positive that Instreet is regulated by ASIC, the high-risk label and "suspicious scope of business" warning on their profile make me extra cautious. Until Instreet publishes full details on what leverage—if any—is available for their offerings, I cannot comment further or compare them to industry norms for forex or other products. For my portfolio, I require complete transparency before considering any engagement.
Could you break down the total trading costs involved when trading indices such as the US100 on Instreet?
As a trader with years of experience evaluating brokers, I always pay close attention to transparency around trading costs. When considering Instreet for trading indices like the US100, I found it challenging to get a clear understanding of the total trading costs due to Instreet's limited public disclosure on spreads, commissions, leverage, or minimum deposit requirements. While Instreet is regulated by ASIC and operates under a Straight Through Processing (STP) license, I noticed that there’s scant information available regarding trading conditions—especially those directly affecting trading costs. From my research, Instreet specializes more in structured investment products and index-linked solutions rather than offering traditional forex or CFD trading platforms. There’s no mention of demo accounts or detailed contract specifications, so I couldn’t obtain concrete figures for spreads or transaction fees on the US100 or other indices. Without these key details, I found it nearly impossible to calculate potential total trading costs for active trading strategies. Because indices trading costs typically comprise spread, commission, and any swap or overnight holding fees, the lack of precise data means I would exercise significant caution before committing funds. Personally, I look for brokers with clear, upfront disclosures about all trading expenses. In the absence of such transparency at Instreet, I would be wary of hidden or unpredictable costs, and I would recommend contacting their customer service directly for up-to-date, detailed cost information before proceeding.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
