SANKO · 三晃證券

As an experienced trader who takes the cost structure of brokers seriously, I approached SANKO with a cautious mindset, especially given my priorities around transparency and avoiding unexpected fees. Based on all the information I was able to obtain, I found no publicly available details or disclosures about inactivity fees associated with SANKO. The lack of information presented by the firm stands out to me, particularly since fee schedules—especially those related to inactivity—can impact the overall profitability of my trading activities. SANKO is a Japanese broker with a legitimate retail forex license from the FSA, which generally suggests a certain standard of transparency and client protection. However, the firm does not provide an English website, limits its information to Japanese, and has not made its policies on inactivity fees or broader fee structures readily accessible. To me, this lack of disclosure is something I approach with extra caution. I always prefer clear and comprehensive fee information beforehand, as this allows me to accurately assess my ongoing costs and avoid any surprises. In my experience, when a broker does not clearly outline inactivity fees, it is wise to reach out directly to their customer support for clarification before opening an account or initiating any transactions. Without explicit confirmation in writing, I would not assume that inactivity fees do not exist, and I always recommend erring on the side of caution in such cases. For my own peace of mind and the integrity of my trading, I make sure to obtain any ambiguous information in writing.

From my experience evaluating brokers, it’s important to check not just their licensing, but also their specific offerings and limitations. With SANKO, my observations are that despite being regulated in Japan and holding a retail forex license, its core focus appears to be on traditional financial instruments such as stocks, futures, options, bonds, ETFs, and REITs. I did not find any evidence that SANKO deals in cryptocurrencies or even offers crypto trading. Additionally, there’s a lack of clear information about funding methods; their website is only available in Japanese and the available context does not mention support for crypto deposits such as Bitcoin or USDT. Given my own cautious approach when handling account funding, I would not assume support for crypto transfers without explicit confirmation. Japanese-regulated brokers, particularly those primarily serving the domestic market, tend to adopt traditional funding channels rather than newer digital assets. For me, this means I’d avoid attempting to fund a SANKO account with cryptocurrencies until official, up-to-date guidance is provided directly by the broker. In my experience, when working with a broker that isn’t clear or transparent about deposit options, I always recommend erring on the side of caution and using only the methods explicitly listed and confirmed by their customer service.

Based on my experience reviewing SANKO and referencing all available broker details, I found that specific information regarding the lowest single withdrawal amount allowed from a SANKO account is not disclosed. This lack of clear, accessible information raises an important consideration for me as a trader, particularly regarding transparency and ease of funds management. In my trading journey, I have learned that withdrawal policies—especially minimum withdrawal amounts—are crucial for day-to-day planning and risk management. SANKO is regulated in Japan under an FSA retail forex license, suggesting a baseline level of oversight and client protection, which gives me some reassurance about general business practice. However, the absence of visible data on withdrawal rules could make it harder for me or any new client to confidently plan their trading activity, particularly if liquidity or quick access to funds is a priority. I always recommend thoroughly confirming all withdrawal-related conditions directly with a broker's support team before making any funding decisions. As a cautious trader, ensuring full clarity on such operational details is fundamental to safeguarding both capital and peace of mind.

From my perspective as a trader with years of independent decision-making, I approach SANKO with a particular mix of confidence and caution. On one hand, SANKO stands out for being regulated by Japan’s Financial Services Agency, operating under a retail forex license for over 15 years. In my experience, FSA supervision generally strengthens the perception of legitimacy, as Japan’s regulatory environment is known for its rigorous standards. For me, a verified office location and a longstanding operational history tend to reduce the likelihood of outright fraud. However, my assessment is tempered by notable limitations. SANKO does not provide access to common international trading platforms like MT4 or MT5, which could pose challenges for those used to a broader technology ecosystem. Moreover, there is an absence of detailed information about spreads, leverage, and account types. The lack of a demo account also makes it harder for new or international traders to get a risk-free sense of the platform before committing funds. It’s also clear that SANKO primarily caters to domestic traders, as key materials are only available in Japanese. Although I value SANKO’s regulatory credentials and business longevity, I remain cautious due to its limited transparency and lack of globally familiar trading tools. For me, SANKO seems credible within its domestic context, but I would only consider it after careful due diligence and with a full understanding of its scope and limitations.