天眼評分
KKJSEC
http://www.kkjsec.com
官方網址
評分指數
影響力
影響力
D
影響力指數 NO.1
聯繫方式
暫未查證到有效監管資訊,請注意風險!
- 經查證,該交易商當前暫無有效外匯監管,請注意風險!
瀏覽KKJSEC 的用戶還瀏覽了..
STARTRADER
CPT Markets
官網鑒定
kkjsec.com
124.153.118.139伺服器所在地印度
備案號--主要訪問國家/地區--功能變數名稱創建時間--網站名稱--所屬公司--
公司簡介
| KKJSEC 檢討摘要 | |
| 成立年份 | 1986 |
| 註冊國家/地區 | 印度 |
| 監管 | 無監管 |
| 服務 | 股票和衍生品、商品、保險、首次公開募股 |
| 模擬帳戶 | ❌ |
| 交易平台 | ODIN(Financial Technologies)、COMTEK(後勤辦公室) |
| 客戶支援 | 一般:info@kkjsec.com |
| 投訴:grief@kkjsec.com | |
| 管理:nikhil@kkjsec.com | |
| 首席主管:Nikhil Jalan 先生 - 手機:+91 9833915980 | |
KKJSEC 資訊
成立於1986年,總部設於印度的 KKJSEC 提供一系列金融服務,包括共同基金、保險、商品、BSE/NSE股票和衍生品交易。旨在為當地的零售和機構客戶提供服務,透過ODIN和COMTEK系統提供交易服務。然而,它缺乏印度證券交易委員會(SEBI)的監管。

優缺點
| 優點 | 缺點 |
| 悠久的運營歷史 | 無監管 |
| 廣泛的金融服務範疇,包括股票和存管 | 不提供模擬帳戶 |
| 提供後勤辦公室訪問和線上交易工具 |
KKJSEC 是否合法?
否,KKJSEC 沒有受到監管。它成立於印度,但並未獲得任何印度金融機構,包括印度證券交易委員會(SEBI)的監管許可。

域名kkjsec.com的最近修改日期為2025年4月11日,註冊日期為2005年4月23日。域名的到期日期為2028年4月23日。它使用ns1.cp-ht-10.webhostbox.net和ns2.cp-ht-10.webhostbox.net作為主機名稱伺服器。

KKJSEC 服務
網上交易、商品、保險、存管服務、以及股票和衍生品交易僅是KKJSEC提供的眾多金融服務之一。通過其子公司,使在BSE和NSE交易所進行交易變得更加容易。
| 服務 | 特色 |
| BSE - NSE 交易 | 在BSE和NSE市場進行股票和衍生品交易 |
| 市場研究 | 市場分析和研究服務 |
| 機構服務 | 為機構客戶提供定制的金融服務 |
| 套利 | 套利交易策略 |
| 存管服務 | 股份存管帳戶服務和股票結算 |
| 保險 | 保險產品和諮詢 |
| 商品交易 | 在商品市場進行投資 |
| 網上交易 | 用戶便利的網上交易平台 |
| IPO、NFO和共同基金 | 與首次公開募股、新基金優惠和共同基金投資相關的服務 |
| 結算會員 | 結算服務,確保及時交易結算 |

交易平台
KKJSEC提供了由ODIN驅動的網上交易平台,使用戶能夠安全獨立地進行交易。還包括了由COMTEK提供支援的後勤辦公室,用於檢查交易報告和分類帳。
| 交易平台 | 支援 | 可用設備 | 適合對象 |
| ODIN(金融科技) | ✔ | 桌面、網頁 | 希望更多控制直接交易輸入的活躍交易者 |
| E-BackOffice(COMTEK) | ✔ | 網頁 | 需要即時訪問分類帳和交易摘要的投資者 |

企業畫像
- 5-10年
- 監管牌照存疑
- 展業區域存疑
- 高級風險隱患
Wiki問答
Does KKJSEC offer fixed or variable spreads, and how do these spreads typically respond during periods of high market volatility or major news events?
Based on my research and experience navigating broker offerings, I could not find clear, detailed information from KKJSEC regarding their spread structure—whether fixed or variable spreads are in use. This, for me as a trader, is a significant concern. Transparent disclosure of spread dynamics is critical, especially when planning for execution costs under various market conditions. In my practice, the type of spread—fixed or variable—directly affects my risk planning during major news events or volatile sessions. With reputable and regulated brokers, I usually expect explicit documentation about spread policy, which gives me confidence in cost predictability. However, KKJSEC not only omits this detail but also operates without regulatory oversight from SEBI or any recognized authority. To me, this lack of regulation amplifies vulnerability, as traders may face unexpected spread widening during high-impact announcements, a time when trade execution and cost management are most crucial. Without transparent data from KKJSEC on how their spreads behave during volatility, I have to err on the side of caution. From an experienced perspective, this opacity is a red flag; I think it's prudent to avoid trading with any brokerage where core trade conditions, especially around cost and execution during news events, are unclear and unregulated.
Does KKJSEC charge any undisclosed fees when making deposits or withdrawals?
As an independent trader evaluating KKJSEC, I pay very close attention to transparency, especially regarding fees on deposits and withdrawals. Based on my review of available information, I found no clear disclosure about fee structures for these transactions. For me, this lack of clarity is a significant concern. Transparency around fund movements is essential for trust and risk management, and any uncertainty in this area makes it much harder to assess total trading costs or to plan cash flow. KKJSEC operates without regulation from any recognized authority like SEBI, and is flagged on reputable review sites for suspicious regulatory status and high risks. In my experience, inadequate or missing disclosure around client fund processes—with no regulatory oversight—tends to increase the chances of encountering unexpected or hidden fees. I’ve seen in the industry that unregulated brokers sometimes impose charges without prior notice, or their terms can change arbitrarily, affecting withdrawals or deposits directly. Therefore, while I did not see explicit evidence that KKJSEC charges undisclosed fees on deposits or withdrawals, the lack of detailed, transparent information paired with their regulatory status makes me very cautious. Without clear documentation and regulatory safeguards, I cannot confidently rule out the risk of unexpected charges. For my own trading, such gaps are a critical red flag, and I would proceed only if full fee schedules and transaction policies are disclosed in writing.
Could you break down the total trading costs involved for trading indices such as the US100 on KKJSEC?
As an experienced forex trader, when I consider using a broker for trading indices like the US100, one of my first priorities is to fully understand the total cost structure—spread, commission, account fees, and any hidden charges that could impact my bottom line. In the case of KKJSEC, my research raised significant concerns due to the absence of clear, transparent information regarding trading costs for specific products such as US indices. KKJSEC does not display standardized brokerage fee schedules or detailed breakdowns for trading costs on indices, at least not in the public domain. Unlike more established and regulated brokers, where one can typically review spread tables, commission structures, and overnight financing rates (swaps) before opening an account, KKJSEC’s cost disclosures are at best opaque. Furthermore, since they don’t offer demo accounts, I cannot test their platform to estimate average spreads or simulate cost scenarios with virtual funds. What complicates matters further is KKJSEC’s unregulated status, especially lacking SEBI oversight. For me, this is a red flag: the absence of regulatory supervision means that fee practices could change unexpectedly or deviate from standard market norms. Charges such as platform fees, data subscriptions, or even withdrawal processing costs could also arise, and these are important for traders to clarify before committing any capital. Given all this, I would exercise considerable caution and insist on receiving a full, clear, and official statement of all trading fees—spreads, commissions, margin requirements, and any auxiliary costs—directly from their support team. Without this transparency, I strongly believe that the true cost of trading indices like the US100 on KKJSEC is unpredictable, which poses an unacceptable risk to my capital and trading strategy.
Is it possible to trade particular assets such as Gold (XAU/USD) and Crude Oil on the KKJSEC platform?
As an experienced trader who reviews brokers with a keen focus on regulation and reputational standing, I approach new platforms with extra caution—especially when weighing whether to trade sensitive assets like Gold (XAU/USD) and Crude Oil. Based on my direct investigation into KKJSEC, I’ve found that the broker does offer access to both equity and commodity trading. Their services explicitly mention commodity markets, which typically would include major assets like gold and crude oil. However, the information provided is quite general and does not specify the precise commodity instruments or whether spot contracts like XAU/USD or international oil CFDs are supported. In my view, the absence of a transparent asset list, combined with the broker’s lack of regulatory oversight by any recognized authority (notably SEBI in India), raises important red flags. From personal risk management experience, I am hesitant to engage with brokers who don’t lay out asset details clearly or operate outside established regulatory frameworks. These are both essential for ensuring client protection, transparent pricing, and secure fund management. Given my conservative approach, while there is an indication that commodity trading is available, I cannot confirm with certainty that KKJSEC reliably offers trading on Gold (XAU/USD), Crude Oil, or popular derivatives typically favored by forex and CFD traders. For anyone considering such trades, my advice is to only proceed after seeking direct confirmation from the broker, reviewing all contract specifications, and, ideally, choosing a provider with clear, robust regulation. For me, the level of ambiguity and high potential risk here means I would personally look elsewhere for commodity trading.
你要評價的內容
請輸入...
