简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
US Federal Court Imposes Permanent Trading Ban on PaxForex
Abstract:The court order seeks the defendant to pay a civil monetary penalty of $374,864.

The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced on Friday that a US Federal Court imposed a ban and a penalty against PaxForex, a forex broker, which operates under the regulation of St. Vincent and the Grenadines. Judge David Hittner of the US District Court for the Southern District of Texas determined that the forex Trading Platform offers illegal leveraged transactions in Cryptocurrencies and commodities.
The default judgment orders PaxForex, which has a legal name dubbed 'Laino Group Limited', to pay a civil monetary penalty of $374,864. Furthermore, the platform was imposed with permanent trading, solicitation and registration bans. “The order, entered on June 30, 2021, stems from a CFTC complaint filed on September 24, 2020, that charged PaxForex with engaging in illegal, off-exchange transactions in Ether, Litecoin and Bitcoin, in addition to precious metals and foreign currency, with retail customers on a leveraged, margined or financed basis and acting as a futures commission merchant (FCM) without CFTC registration as required,” the CFTC detailed.
Also, the complaint filed before the court alleges that PaxForex has been involved in 'unlawful' precious metals transactions such as Gold, Silver and cryptos like Bitcoin (BTC) and Ethereum (ETH). “The defendant violated the CEA by failing to conduct these transactions subject to the rules of a board of trade that had been designated or registered with the CFTC as a contract market,” the regulator argued.
Violating the Commodity Exchange Act
Moreover, the CFTC noted that the broker, through its employees and agents, has been accepting or soliciting orders for forex and retail commodity transactions, as well as accepting money and cryptos. “The CFTC strongly urges the public to verify a companys registration with the CFTC before committing funds. A customer should be wary of providing funds to an unregistered entity,” the CFTC warned.
Recently, in a separate case, the CFTC announced that it filed a civil enforcement action against Troy Manson and his company, ZTegrity Inc., for allegedly being involved in a forex-related fraud.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Deriv Withdrawal Issues: Real Client Cases Exposed
Deriv exposed via client cases of withdrawal issues, 13‑month refund delays, severe slippage, and disabled accounts despite multiple “regulated” licenses.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.
