简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Apple defeats copyright lawsuit over racially diverse emoji
Abstract:Apple Inc convinced a California federal judge on Wednesday to throw out a lawsuit accusing the tech giant of ripping off another companys multiracial emoji and violating its intellectual property rights.

Cub Club Investment LLC didnt show that Apple copied anything that was eligible for copyright protection, U.S. District Judge Vince Chhabria said.
Chhabria gave Cub Club a chance to amend its lawsuit but said he was “skeptical” it could succeed based on several differences between its emoji design and Apples.
Texas-based Cub Club‘s 2020 lawsuit said that its founder Katrina Parrott created and launched the “iDiversicons” app in 2013, calling it the world’s first emoji with diverse skin tones.
Cub Club said Parrott discussed a potential partnership with Apple representatives in 2014, and that Apple created its own set of multiracial emoji after declining to work with her. It said Apple‘s emoji infringed its copyrights and trademark rights, arguing they copied iDiversicons’ five skin tones and other features.
Chhabria said in a Wednesday order that even if the complaint was true, Apple at most copied Cub Clubs unprotectable “idea” of diverse emoji.
“There arent many ways that someone could implement this idea,” Chhabria said. “After all, there are only so many ways to draw a thumbs up.”
Cub Club only owns weak copyrights in the unique expressive aspects of its designs, and Apple‘s emojis weren’t similar enough to infringe them, Chhabria said, citing differences in their coloring, shapes, and other features.
Chhabria also found that Cub Club didnt have protectable trademark rights for its emoji.
Apple and attorneys for both companies did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The case is Cub Club Investment LLC v. Apple Inc, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, No. 3:21-cv-06948.
For Cub Club: Todd Patterson of Patterson + Sheridan
For Apple: Andrew Gass of Latham & Watkins

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.

In-Depth Review of MH Markets Trading Conditions and Leverage – An Analysis for Experienced Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond marketing claims and bonus offers. It involves a granular analysis of the core trading environment: the quality of execution, the flexibility of leverage, the integrity of the regulatory framework, and the suitability of the conditions for one's specific strategy. MH Markets, a broker with a 5-10 year operational history, presents a complex and multifaceted profile that warrants such a detailed examination. This in-depth review dissects the MH Markets trading conditions and leverage, using primary data from the global broker inquiry app, WikiFX, to provide a clear, data-driven perspective. We will analyze the broker's execution environment, account structures, and regulatory standing to determine which types of traders might find its offering compelling and what critical risks they must consider.
