简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
WIKIFX REPORT: Investors take Forex platform ROFX and its founders to Court
Abstract:Dozens of victims of the ROFX forex trading platform have sued the company and its founders for alleged fraud.

Dozens of victims of forex trading platform ROFX have taken the entity and its founders to Court over alleged fraud.
The Complaint, seen by FX News Group, was filed in the Florida Southern District Court on September 29, 2021.
The plaintiffs are Ryan Birmingham, Roman Leonov, Mitchell Parent, Jonathan Zarley, and Steven Hansen – ROFX.net investors and citizens of the United States of America. Further, there are letters from 300 victims in support of forming a class.
The list of defendants includes: ROFX.net, Auro Advantages LLC, Aware Choice Ltd., Boonruk Ruamkit Co., Ltd., Brass Marker s.r.o., Easy Com LC, Epayments Systems Ltd., Ester Holdings Inc., Global E-Advantages LLC, Grovee, LLC, Igoria Trade S.A., IT Outsourcing Co., Ltd., Notus LLC, Shopostar, LLC, VDD-Trading, Ltd., Wealthy Developments LP, Andrei Fetin, Anna Shymko, Anton Bilous, Borys Konovalenko, Dmytro Fokin, Jorge Luis Castillo, Manuchar Daraselia, Mikhail Rymanov, Natalia Los, Nattpemol Krinara, PapahraTsor Nrviratporn, Peter Mogilniy, Stanislav Khomenko, Youras Ziankovich and John Does 1-30.
According to the Complaint, the defendants orchestrated a massive international scheme to defraud the investors by soliciting them to deposit money or cash equivalents with ROFX, a “robotically operated foreign exchange trading” platform that purportedly utilized algorithms to trade on behalf of investors. In exchange for the funds, the defendants falsely promised a return on investment in the form of a percentage of ROFXs daily trading profit that never came to pass.
After maximizing their current account balances and creating the illusion of stability for in excess of two years, ROFX distributed little profit to its investors, prevented investors from making withdrawals, and thereafter stole all remaining investment capital to perpetuate a massive fraud that is global in scope.
The defendants‘ conduct occurred as early as 2016 and has continued to the present. The Complaint alleges that, as a consequence of the defendants’ fraudulent scheme, the plaintiffs and the class members suffered significant harm, losing tens of millions of dollars by investing with ROFX under the false impression that they were investing with a legitimate foreign exchange trading platform.
The plaintiffs explain that they have brought the emergency action for fraud pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23 on behalf of a global class of ROFX investors. In addition to damages, including costs of suit, interest, and reasonable attorneys‘ fees resulting from the defendants’ fraudulent conduct, unjust enrichment and violations of federal RICO statutes, the plaintiffs, on behalf of the class, seek injunctive relief to maintain the status quo and preserve assets for the victims of this fraudulent scheme.
Specifically, the plaintiffs seek an immediate order: (i) freezing all ROFX assets and enjoining and restraining Defendants from dissipating or encumbering any of these assets; (ii) preventing the destruction of financial records and any other relevant documents; and (iii) permitting expedited discovery into the facts alleged herein.
The plaintiffs claim that the victims reported ROFX account balances are in excess of $15 million and growing.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Charles Schwab Review: Traders Claim Illegitimate Profit Cancellation, Trade Manipulation & More
Have you been lured into the Charles Schwab app for trading on the back of outrageous profit claims by the broker? Did you fail to receive any of these? Does the broker deny withdrawals every time you request and cancel your forex trading account? Have you been victimized financially by its trade manipulation? Act before you are left with a NIL balance in your account. Many traders have questioned Charles Schwab customer service and many other operational executives for the aforementioned illegitimate trading activities. In this Charles Schwab review article, we have shared some of their comments. Read on!

AMP Futures Exposed: Traders Raise Alarms Over Illegitimate Account Blocks & Bad Customer Service
Has AMP Futures blocked your forex trading account? Does it fail to provide any explanation for this act? Do you face issues concerning deposits to your AMP Futures account? Is the customer service non-existent for any trading query you raise with it? You are not alone! Many traders have been facing these issues upon AMP Futures login. Some of them have commented on AMP Futures review platforms. In this article, we have shared some reviews that you can look at. Read on!

FXGlory Review: Vanishing Profits, Capital Scams & Withdrawal Charges Keep Annoying Traders
Does FXGlory remove all your forex trading account balances upon fund withdrawal requests? Or do you witness incorrect trading account balances after fund withdrawals? Does the Saint Lucia-based forex broker charge you for fund withdrawals? All these and many more scam-related complaints have been filed against the forex broker. In this FXGlory review article, we will discuss several complaints. Read on!

PINAKINE Broker Review: A Complete Look at Its Services and Risks
Finding a trustworthy broker from the huge and often confusing world of online trading options is one of the biggest challenges a trader faces. In this competitive market, PINAKINE Liquidity Limited has appeared, getting attention with promises of high leverage and zero-commission trading. However, a closer look shows important factors that every potential client must think about before investing. The most important thing to consider with PINAKINE is that it has no regulation. This fact completely changes how risky the broker is and has major effects on how safe your investments will be. This review gives a complete and fair examination based on information available to the public. We will break down its services, trading conditions, platform technology, and the possible risks involved, helping you make a fully informed decision.

