简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Voyager Digital Shares Slump on Possible 3AC Loan Default
Abstract:Three Arrows Capital was back in the news this week, with news of a possible loan default sinking TSX listed Voyager Digital on Wednesday.

On Wednesday, Voyager Digital Ltd (“VOYG”), listed on the TSX, slumped by 52.5%.
News of a possible Three Arrows Capital $650 million loan default hit VOYG shares.
Market conditions have increased calls for a more regimen crypto regulatory framework. The Lummis and Gillibrand bill may kick start the process.
In recent weeks, crypto-related companies have frequented the news wires, with the media reporting on the effects of the extended crypto winter.
Numerous companies have made announcements of plans to tighten the purse strings.
While it has been a bleak winter, leading exchanges dont envisage market conditions improving anytime soon.
Prevailing market headwinds include inflation, central bank monetary policy, and the threat of a global recession.
On top of these more broad-based headwinds impacting the global financial markets, the collapse of TerraUSD (UST) and Terra LUNA has added to the crypto market woes. Regulators have found a new impetus to roll out more restrictive rules that could prove punitive to the crypto market.
Market share prices of publicly listed crypto exchanges have reflected investor sentiment towards the crypto market outlook.
Voyager Digital Shares Tumble 52.5% on News of a Possible Loan Default
On Wednesday, Voyager Digital Ltd. (VOYG), listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX), tumbled by 52.5%.
The extended sell-off saw VOYG slide to a new current-year low of C$0.55 before a partial recovery to close the day at C$0.76.
VOYG had slumped by 58% before the partial recovery. More significantly, VOYG was down 97% year-to-date.
While the crypto winter has taken a bite, the latest sell-off was in response to news of a possible loan default.
On Wednesday, Voyager Digital Ltd., owner of crypto exchange Voyager Digital issued a press release relating to its subsidiary Voyager Digital LLC.
According to the press release,
“Voyager Digital Holdings, Inc. (”VHD“) has entered into a definitive agreement with Alameda Ventures Ltd. (”Alameda“) related to the previously disclosed credit facility, which is intended to help Voyager meet customer liquidity needs during this dynamic period.”
The press release went on to say,
“VDH entered into a definitive agreement with Alameda for a US$200 million cash and USDC revolver and a 15,000 BTC revolver (the ”Loan).
In addition, the press release announced,
“Concurrently, Voyager announced that its operating subsidiary, Voyager Digital, LLC, may issue a notice of default to Three Arrows Capital (”3AC“) for failure to repay its loan.”
The press release added,
“Voyager exposure to 3AC consists of 15,250 BTC and $350 million USDC.”
Voyager Digital, LLC has requested payment of $25 million USDC by June 24 and repayment of the entire balance by June 27.
Founded in 2018, Voyager is a US cryptocurrency platform that supports the trading of more than 100 crypto assets. Its subsidiary, Coinify ApS enables Voyager to also offer crypto payment solutions for consumers and merchants globally.
Voyager Digital LLC Puts the Regulatory Spotlight Back on Cryptos
Wednesdays sell-off and the Voyager press release put the spotlight back on the crypto market.
The press release highlights a lack of controls. Voyager was able to issue a loan more than four times in size than its very own cash and crypto equivalent on hand, which reportedly stood at $152 million.
With Coinbase, Gemini, and FTX having to tighten the purse strings and lawsuits filed in their droves, a regulatory overhaul could be a positive rather than a negative.
The collapse of TerraUSD and Terra LUNA and contagion across the broader market calls for a more rigid framework.
However, it remains to be seen whether the Lummis and Gillibrand bill will make its way through Congress unscathed to give the CFTC overall responsibility.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Voices of the Golden Insight Award Jury | Nattachai Chalermwat, MH Markets
WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

Apex Markets Review: Traders Outraged Over Withdrawal Denials & Other Trading Issues
Struggling to access fund withdrawals from Apex Markets for months? Does the broker remain silent on fund withdrawal issues? Does the Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker reject your winning trades? Have you failed to get a refund into the card used for deposits? Did the broker deduct from your trading account instead? Traders have been imposing these scam allegations while sharing the Apex Markets Review online. We read the reviews and shared some of them below. Take a look!

tastyfx Exposed: Fund Losses, Trade Manipulation & Account Related Hassles Hurt Traders
Are fund losses normal for you at tastyfx? Does the US-based forex broker constantly manipulate prices to hit your trading experience? Do you fail to receive a reply from the broker on your fund withdrawal requests? Do you constantly face trading account issues with tastyfx? It’s time to read the tastyfx review shared by traders online.

Aron Groups Review: Fund Losses, High Commission & Trade Manipulation Keep Traders on Tenterhooks
Have you lost your hard-earned capital while trading via Aron Groups Broker? Has the high commission charged by the broker substantially reduced your trading profits? Does the Marshall Islands-based forex broker constantly manipulate spreads to widen your capital losses? Have you been lured into trading courtesy of Aron Groups No Deposit Bonus, only to find that you had to deposit capital to get a bonus? All these and many more trading issues have become synonymous with the experience of Aron Groups’ traders. Consequently, many traders have shared negative Aron Groups reviews online. In this article, we have shared some of their reviews.
