WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:There were 11 underlying issues resulting in failure. The bank was aware of the inaccuracies from mid-2017.

Barclays accepted a censure order imposed by the US Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA) for non-compliance with customer confirmation and related supervision rules as well as having agreed to pay a penalty of $2.8 million.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
According to the regulatory body‘s order, the multinational bank violated the mandatory rules from November 2008. It sent customers around 270 million confirmations with inaccurate disclosure of execution capacity, the customer’s price, the market center of execution and the trade execution price.
The failure was the result of 11 underlying issues that include technological glitches, drafting errors and a misunderstanding of regulatory guidance. All of these issues have remained undetected for at least five years.
Additionally, the banking giant had no supervisory system to review the accuracy of its confirmations from at least November 2008 till March 2020. Additionally, there is an unreasonable supervisory system in place from April 2020 until now.
Moreover, the order stated that Barclays was aware of the multiple systemic issues resulting in inaccurate confirmation from mid-2017, but the issues still persisted.
Despite Barclays reputation, it has faced multiple regulatory fines over the years. Earlier this year, FINRA slapped the bank with a $350,000 penalty for lapses in market access controls, while the FCA imposed another £783,800 fine for failings in oversight in its relationship with Premier FX.
Also, Barclays paid hundreds of thousands of dollars to FINRA and other US market overseers for other multiple lapses.
However, Barclays is not the only capital market player to face such monetary penalties. Furthermore, FINRA slapped a $9 million penalty on National Securities Corp last week for multiple cases of misconduct.
UBS, another major name in the wealth management and banking industry, recently settled fraud charges brought against it by the SEC paying $25 million for marketing and selling of a complex investment strategy.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.