简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：Clients must submit claims before April 2023. The license of the brokerage operator was canceled last February.
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) announced on Thursday the commencement of the compensation process under the Investor Compensation Fund (ICF) to the clients of Maxigrid Ltd, which operates FX and CFDs broker brands, Dualix and AGM Markets.
Take Advantage of the Biggest Financial Event in London. This year we have expanded to new verticals in Online Trading, Fintech, Digital Assets, Blockchain, and Payments.
The regulator now has detailed the process of claiming compensation, which can be done both online and offline with supporting documents.
“Covered clients must submit their claims against the Company, if any, arising out of the covered services, by the 30th of April 2023,” the regulator added.
CySECs ICF covers the deposits of all clients of any locally regulated financial services company up to €20,000. The compensation funds are used in the case of the service providers becoming bankrupt or unable to return customer deposits due to financial constraints.
Maxigrid ran the operations from its Cypriot base after receiving a Cyprus Investment Firm (CIF) license in 2011. However, its license was withdrawn by the Cypriot regulator last February. The broker violated multiple mandatory compliance rules that led to the cancellation of its license.
The license of the brokers was also suspended multiple times before the cancellation.
The Cypriot regulator initiated ICF proceedings for Maxigrid last June after the regulatory board decided on it in late March. According to the regulator, the brokerage operator is “unable to meet its obligations arising out of investors' claims and has no early prospect of being able to do so.”
The latest regulatory announcement added: “Before submitting an application to the ICF, all parties concerned (covered clients of the Company) are invited to study the relevant provisions of MiFID II, the ICF Directive, as well as the information on the submission of applications for payment of compensation posted on the CySEC website and take all necessary actions to submit their claims. The existence of a valid claim by the claimant is an essential requirement for receiving the compensation.”
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.
Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.
When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
