Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Commodity Pool Operator Ordered to Pay $24 Million for Forex Fraud Targeting Minority Group as CFTC continues to crack down on forex-related fraud schemes.

A US district court in Wisconsin has issued a judgment ordering Kay Yang, a commodity pool operator, and her companies to pay over $24 million in connection with a retail forex fraud scheme that specifically targeted members of the Hmong minority group in the country. The payment includes a restitution payment of $13.6 million and a civil monetary penalty of $10.3 million.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) announced the court order, highlighting that it was entered last Monday. Additionally, the court ruled that Chao Yang, Kay's husband, must pay $1.4 million in illegal funds he received from the fraudulent scheme.
The CFTC filed a lawsuit against Kay and her companies, AK Equity Group LLC and Xapphire LLC, in April of the previous year. The allegations stated that they unlawfully solicited a minimum of $15.7 million from approximately 67 investors, enticing them to participate in a commodity pool supposedly for forex trading. At the time, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) also brought charges against Kay in relation to the scheme.
According to the CFTC, Yang and her companies engaged in deceptive practices and withheld critical information throughout the scheme, which took place from April 2017 to March 2020. It was also stated that the defendants also misappropriated at least $4.8 million of pool participants' funds and spent that money on Yang's personal expenses, including spending nearly $1.4 million at casinos and on luxury hotels and cars.
This recent court order demonstrates the ongoing efforts of the CFTC to combat fraudulent and unregistered forex firms operating within the country. In late April, the regulatory agency charged 14 retail FX dealers and futures commission merchants for falsely claiming to be registered with the agency. Among the dealers, which purported to be based in the US, UK, and Sweden, were Cross Trade FX, Volfxtrade, TFX Trading, and Bit Trading.
Earlier in February, the CFTC filed a lawsuit against five individuals and three associated companies for their involvement in three interconnected forex trading Ponzi schemes totaling $145 million. The schemes allegedly defrauded over a thousand investors, and the regulator is seeking to recover the investors' funds while pursuing civil penalties against the individuals involved.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

Investigate Market10’s regulation status and recent user allegations. Learn why caution is advised with this Forex broker. Read our Market10 review now!