GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:In this article, WikiFX would like to alert our users about the online broker, Wisemarket, as it has come under scrutiny due to withdrawal issues faced by investors.

Investing in financial markets can present an enticing opportunity for wealth accumulation, yet it also carries inherent risks, especially when engaging with online brokers. Wisemarkets has come under scrutiny for withdrawal problems experienced by investors, as exemplified by the individual we'll feature in this article.
Established in 2022, Wisemarket is a forex and CFD broker registered in St. Vincent and the Grenadines, a jurisdiction known for its lenient regulations on forex trading. However, Wisemarket operates without a valid license, making it a cause for concern.

Therefore, Wisemarket has a low rating on WikiFX, with a score of 1.24 out of 10. This is due to several factors, including a lack of transparency about the company's ownership and financial status, and the invalid license claim.


In the midst of an initially promising journey into the world of trading, a user had eagerly chosen Wisemarkets as their trusted broker. Lured by the enticing 50% credit support margin offered after a substantial $1,000 deposit, they embarked on their trading adventure with optimism. The markets appeared to be in their favor, as they managed to amass a profit of $3,400.
Anticipation turned to disappointment as they sought to reap the rewards of their hard-earned gains. On July 21, 2023, they initiated a withdrawal request with the hope of realizing their financial dreams. The request made its way through Wisemarkets' system on July 27, 2023, but as time passed, the funds remained frustratingly elusive in their bank account. Days turned into weeks, and as of October 4, 2023, the funds were still mired in a seemingly endless state of pending status.


Growing increasingly helpless and disheartened, the user turned to Wisemarkets' support team for guidance and resolution. Their plea, however, was met with a response that had become all too familiar. Wisemarkets had provided them with a lengthy message, ostensibly aimed at reassuring the user that their request had indeed been approved within the system. This step was emphasized as the “completion of our internal process.”
Yet, amid these words of reassurance, the message carried an unsettling undertone. It conveyed a critical point: the subsequent stages of the transaction were now frustratingly dependent on the often-opaque and enigmatic banking system. Wisemarkets explained that the duration of the transaction was at the mercy of the banking transfer system specific to the user's locality and jurisdiction, a process over which they had no direct control.
As an international platform, Wisemarkets catered to a diverse clientele scattered across the globe. The message ominously pointed out that the efficiency of these various banking systems could vary significantly based on geographical location, rendering the user powerless in the face of the ominous bureaucracy.

The user was urged to continue waiting with what little patience they had left. Wisemarkets maintained their commitment to assisting clients, but the user's growing sense of hopelessness and helplessness was palpable. Like many others who navigate the complex world of international trading, they found themselves ensnared in a disheartening web of uncertainty, where the pace of financial transactions was influenced by inscrutable factors well beyond their control.
Upon further investigation, WikiFX found that this is not the first time that Wisemarkets receive complaints from clients withdrawal issues.




Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact