简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
SEC Fines JP Morgan $18 Million
Abstract:JP Morgan hit with $18M fine for SEC whistleblower rule violation. Learn about the case and its implications. Stay informed with our updates.

J.P. Morgan Securities LLC (JPMS) has found itself in hot water with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and has agreed to pay a substantial $18 million penalty to resolve allegations of wrongdoing. The SEC has accused JPMS of obstructing its clients from reporting potential violations of securities laws to the regulatory body, a clear violation of whistleblower protection rules.
Here's the crux of the matter: From March 2020 to July 2023, JPMS repeatedly requested its retail clients to sign confidential release agreements, but only if they had received credits or settlements from the company exceeding $1,000. These confidential agreements mandated that clients keep any information related to the settlement and underlying facts confidential. More importantly, these agreements prohibited clients from voluntarily reaching out to the SEC, even though they were allowed to respond to SEC inquiries.
The SEC has come down hard on JPMS for this practice. According to Gurbir S. Grewal, Director of the SEC's Division of Enforcement, “Whether it's in your employment contracts, settlement agreements, or elsewhere, you simply cannot include provisions that prevent individuals from contacting the SEC with evidence of wrongdoing.” Essentially, JPMS put its clients in a difficult situation by making them choose between receiving settlements or credits from the firm and reporting possible securities law violations to the SEC. This either-or scenario not only compromised critical investor protections but was also found to be illegal.

Corey Schuster, Co-Chief of the Enforcement Division's Asset Management Unit, emphasized that “Investors, whether retail or otherwise, must be free to report complaints to the SEC without any interference.” Anyone drafting or using confidentiality agreements needs to ensure they do not include provisions that obstruct potential whistleblowers.
JPMS has been found in violation of Rule 21F-17(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, a whistleblower protection rule explicitly prohibiting actions that hinder individuals from communicating directly with the SEC staff regarding possible securities law violations. While JPMS did not admit wrongdoing, it agreed to a series of measures. These include accepting censure, committing to cease from violating the whistleblower protection rule in the future, and paying the $18 million civil penalty.
The SEC's investigation into JPMS's practices was conducted by Marie DeBonis and Jessica Neiterman, with the assistance of John Farinacci, and it was overseen by Virginia Rosado Desilets, Brianna Ripa, Mr. Schuster, and Andrew Dean, all members of the SEC's Asset Management Unit. Rua Kelly of the Trial Unit also provided support during the investigation.
In conclusion, JPMS's $18 million penalty underscores the importance of adhering to whistleblower protection rules and ensuring that individuals, regardless of their position, can freely report concerns to the SEC. This case serves as a stark reminder that the integrity of our financial system relies on transparency and accountability, and actions that obstruct these principles will not be tolerated.
Explore J.P. Morgan's profile on WikiFX for in-depth information: Visit their WikiFX page here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/8981623292.html

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

WikiEXPO Dubai “Welcome Party” Concludes Successfully, Setting the Stage for the Main Event!
On the evening of November 10, 2025, the highly anticipated WikiEXPO Dubai “Welcome Party” was successfully held at the 6th Floor, Conrad Dubai, UAE. Serving as a “prelude” to the official opening of the expo, this event provided a high-end yet relaxed communication platform for representatives of global regulatory bodies, leaders of Fintech companies, renowned brokers, and senior executives of investment institutions.

VARIANSE Review: Traders Raise Deposit & Withdrawal Issues and High Commission & Swap Charges
Are you losing both while depositing and withdrawing your capital at VARIANSE? Does the broker give the currency conversion rate excuse for this? Have you been trapped with spreads charged higher than promised? Do you bear steep commission and swap charges at this broker? Traders frequently report these trading issues online. In today’s VARIANSE broker review, we have shared some trading complaints that have grabbed everyone’s attention. Take a look.

Is Fyntura a Regulated Broker? A Complete 2025 Broker Review
Fyntura is a broker accused by many users of posting fake reviews and running paid promotions with influencers to attract unsuspecting traders. Several users have faced withdrawal issues, blocked accounts, and manipulated trades. These are the real complaints and experiences shared by traders online. In this latest Fyntura Review 2025, you’ll learn about genuine user feedback, reported issues, and the broker’s credibility helping you make a better trading decision.

Zetradex Exposed: Withdrawal Denials, Account Freeze & Bonus Issues Hurt Traders
Do you constantly face withdrawal denials by Zetradex? Does the forex broker keep freezing your account and wiping out your capital? Have you also undergone issues concerning the Zetradex no deposit bonus? These trading issues have become apparent as the forex broker allegedly scams traders all over. In this Zetradex review article, we have demonstrated some complaints. Read them to get a feel of what happens to traders here.
