Dufourbit Warning: FCA Says the Firm Is Unauthorised—7 Checks Before You Pay
The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
اردو
Abstract:A 47-year-old Malaysian man fell victim to an investment scam, losing RM124,000 after being misled by a fraudulent scheme promoted on social media. The scheme, advertised on Facebook, promised high returns through an application called L-Trader, which the man was led to believe could generate millions in profits.

A 47-year-old Malaysian man fell victim to an investment scam, losing RM124,000 after being misled by a fraudulent scheme promoted on social media. The scheme, advertised on Facebook, promised high returns through an application called L-Trader, which the man was led to believe could generate millions in profits.
Kota Tinggi district police chief Supt Yusof Othman confirmed that the victim, a local resident, lodged a police report after realizing he had been duped. According to the police, the man was enticed by the scheme, which initially showed signs of profitability. He first invested RM55,000 and was given an ID to monitor his supposed earnings through the L-Trader application.
In the early stages, the investment appeared to be legitimate, as the victim believed he was making a profit. Encouraged by the results, the scam operators persuaded him to increase his investment to RM124,000, assuring him of even greater financial gains.

However, the victim became suspicious when he attempted to withdraw his earnings, which he was told had grown to RM9 million. Despite repeated attempts, he was unable to access his profits. The man later discovered that the returns were fabricated, and the investment scheme was a fraud.
The victim had transferred funds in 21 transactions to three separate accounts before realizing he had been scammed. The case is now under investigation by local authorities, with Supt Yusof stating that it falls under Section 420 of the Penal Code, which deals with cheating and dishonestly inducing the delivery of property.
Supt Yusof also issued a warning to the public, urging individuals to exercise caution when considering investments that promise unrealistically high returns in a short period of time. He emphasized the importance of verifying the legitimacy of investment opportunities with relevant financial authorities before proceeding.
The incident serves as a reminder of the increasing prevalence of online scams targeting unsuspecting investors. Scammers often use social media platforms to lure victims, presenting schemes that appear legitimate but are designed to steal money. Authorities continue to advise the public to remain vigilant and report any suspicious activity to prevent further cases of financial fraud.
This case highlights the need for stronger awareness of online investment scams and the importance of conducting thorough research before making any financial commitments. As online fraud continues to rise, individuals are encouraged to prioritize safety over the promise of quick profits.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

The FCA warned about Dufourbit on 19 August 2026. Check the named domain, contact details, missing protections and seven steps before making any payment.

Was your trading experience with Warren Bowie & Smith, a Mauritius-based brokerage entity, not so fruitful? Did the broker tempt you into trading by giving you assurances of profits that never appeared on the Warren Bowie & Smith login dashboard? Did you struggle to withdraw profits from the trading platform? Upon your withdrawal request, did the broker official make you invest further? This Warren Bowie & Smith review examines serious trading allegations against the broker. Additionally, we have provided the broker’s regulatory status.

Angel One, an India-based brokerage entity, constantly receives allegations from users online. Users are complaining about withheld funds, poor customer support service, undesired trade execution orders, etc. In this Angel One review, let’s quickly go through these complaints, understand its regulatory framework and pay attention to the product portfolio.

AuroraEx, a United States-based multi-asset brokerage entity, is facing serious user allegations over how it handles deposited funds. Many users have accused the broker of failing to meet its payment obligations. Some have questioned the broker over possible trade-related foul play, while others have alleged that it scammed them through a Ponzi operation. This AuroraEx review examines these user-reported allegations and provides an overview of the broker’s regulatory status.