Retiree loses over RM337,000 in Facebook investment scam
Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Two Malaysian men have been sentenced in Singapore for orchestrating a S$23 million multi-level marketing (MLM) scheme that defrauded approximately 4,500 investors, including over 2,400 in Singapore.

Two Malaysian men have been sentenced in Singapore for orchestrating a S$23 million multi-level marketing (MLM) scheme that defrauded approximately 4,500 investors, including over 2,400 in Singapore. The scheme, which operated between 2014 and 2015, falsely promised returns from foreign exchange trading and resulted in combined losses exceeding US$13.7 million, with more than US$10 million remaining unrecovered.
The scheme was described by District Judge Soh Tze Bian as one of the most serious cases of fraudulent trading in the country. Leong Koon Wah, aged 51, was identified as the mastermind behind the operation. As the director of Singliworld, Leong promoted the forex trading scheme known as Singliforex, alongside two unlicensed brokerages, Triumph Global (Asia) and Union Markets, which he also ran.
Leong was heavily involved in the design and promotion of the scheme. After an 88-day trial, he pleaded guilty to multiple charges, including operating unlicensed forex trading businesses, promoting a pyramid scheme, and engaging in fraudulent trading. He received a 10-year and six-month prison sentence, along with a penalty of S$3.66 million. He indicated his inability to pay the penalty, which could extend his sentence by an additional 18 months.

Ng Kuan Chuan, aged 38, was a director of Triumph Global and a manager at Union Markets. He played a key role in sustaining the illusion of legitimate forex trading while facilitating the misappropriation of investors funds. Ng was convicted on charges of fraudulent trading and operating unlicensed brokerages. He received a seven-year and six-month prison sentence and a fine of S$300,000. He has since appealed his conviction and sentence.
The Singliforex scheme was marketed as a platform where professional traders would manage forex investments on behalf of clients, promising average monthly returns of 7.54% and allowing investors to retain 70% of the profits. However, no trades were ever conducted. Instead, fake trading statements were issued, and withdrawal requests were fulfilled using funds from other investors.
Judge Soh revealed that the MLM structure reached at least 55 levels of downlines, which amplified its destructive potential. Leong positioned himself and his wife at the top of the pyramid, reaping US$6.5 million in rebates. Significant funds were transferred to their personal accounts, including US$2.7 million to Leong‘s Hong Kong account and over S$500,000 to his wife’s Singapore account.
Ng also benefited financially, with gains estimated at a minimum of US$300,000. Evidence during the trial suggested that this amount could be higher. Additionally, a questionable transfer of nearly US$530,000 was made to a bank account linked to the African Development Funding Group without investors' consent.
Judge Soh highlighted the scheme‘s high level of sophistication and premeditation. This included the use of technical jargon, a complex corporate structure involving shell companies in New Zealand, and overseas bank accounts to mislead investors. He noted that Leong’s extensive experience in MLM schemes demonstrated a calculated awareness of the schemes harmful and illegal nature.
Both men exhibited dishonesty and lack of remorse during the trial. They attempted to shift blame and downplay their roles, which the judge cited as aggravating factors justifying harsher sentences.
Leongs sentence was deferred until January 31, following his request to celebrate Chinese New Year with his family. He remains on bail for S$300,000 and must report to authorities thrice a week. Ng, who is appealing his conviction, was granted a stay of execution. His bail was increased to S$300,000, and he must report biweekly to investigators.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Authorities warn public to verify financial transactions as pensioner duped by fake online investment

Failed to withdraw funds from the BDSWISS trading account despite multiple attempts? Did the broker reject your fund withdrawal application without any reason? Did the high slippage lead to massive capital losses? Was the customer support team far from ideal? Many traders have reported these issues online. In this BDSWISS review article, we have examined several such complaints against the forex broker.

When your capital is at risk, trust isn't just a feeling - it's something you can measure. For traders thinking about using the broker Evest, one question is impossible to avoid: Is Evest a trusted partner for your investments, or does it put your investments at serious risk? The answer to this important question, "Is Evest Safe or Scam?", isn't found in the company's ads. You find it by comparing what the broker officially says with the real, often worrying experiences of actual users. This review won't rely on guessing. Instead, we'll take a deep look at the broker's legal status and, more importantly, the number and types of real Evest complaints. Our research is based on public information, mainly from the worldwide broker research platform, WikiFX, to show the truth about Evest's reputation.

In the fast-moving world of online trading, the most important thing for protecting your investments is not studying the market or having a good trading plan—it is making sure your broker is properly regulated. A license is much more than just paperwork; it is your main protection. When we look at Evest, the question "Is Evest regulated?" has a complicated answer. While the broker does have licenses, our research has found serious warning signs, a confusing company structure, and many concerning complaints from traders that need careful attention. This complete guide will get straight to the point. We will look at Evest's official licenses right away, break down the complex company structure behind the brand, examine the serious complaints from users, and give you our final judgment. Read on!