TigerWit Broker Review: Is TigerWit Legit or a Scam?
Is TigerWit a scam? Review of revoked licenses, unregulated status, MT4 claims, WikiFX complaints & trader withdrawal risks. Hundreds of traders are questioning whether TigerWit is safe in 2025.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Rakuten Securities Inc., one of Japan’s leading online brokerage firms, has ramped up its identity verification measures after falling victim to a wave of fraudulent transactions.

Rakuten Securities Inc., one of Japans leading online brokerage firms, has ramped up its identity verification measures after falling victim to a wave of fraudulent transactions. The incidents, which surfaced in March, were linked to phishing attacks that tricked customers into revealing sensitive login credentials.
The fraudulent activity involved the unauthorised sale of customers‘ stocks and investment trust funds. The proceeds were then used to purchase low-volume stocks in Chinese companies without the account holders’ consent. Rakuten Securities confirmed the transactions had not resulted from an internal data breach, suggesting that customer information remained secure on its servers. However, the company declined to disclose the number or extent of affected transactions, citing concerns over potential repeat offences.
Investigations indicate that phishing emails, mimicking official communication from Rakuten Securities, were at the heart of the scam. These emails urged recipients to confirm their account information for security purposes. Victims who clicked on the provided links were redirected to counterfeit websites designed to steal login details. Once compromised, their accounts were hijacked and manipulated.

The attackers typically sold off the victims existing assets and used the funds to buy Chinese stocks. While the motive behind choosing such stocks remains unclear, company officials suspect that the perpetrators are part of a larger scheme to artificially inflate prices and offload their holdings at a profit.
In response, Rakuten Securities introduced a new security feature on 23 March known as “risk-based authentication.” This mechanism prompts users to provide additional identity verification if they access their accounts using unfamiliar devices. Customers must also call a specific toll-free number from a phone registered with the firm to complete transactions. No prior arrangement is required for this verification process. The firm has also encouraged users to update their PINs as an added precaution.
SBI Securities Co., another prominent Japanese brokerage, has reported similar incidents, although on a significantly smaller scale. Like Rakuten, its customers were targeted by deceptive emails claiming their accounts had been temporarily suspended due to suspicious activity. The emails instructed users to re-enter their credentials to restore access, leading many to unwittingly disclose their private information.
SBI Securities has since decided to strengthen its security infrastructure. Previously, customers only had to undergo two-factor authentication when withdrawing over 500,000 yen (approximately $3,320). From 9 May onwards, this security measure will apply to all withdrawals, regardless of the amount.
Both firms are urging clients to remain vigilant, avoid clicking on unsolicited links, and refrain from entering personal data on suspicious websites. These events underscore a growing threat to online investors, with phishing scams becoming increasingly sophisticated and difficult to detect. As financial institutions bolster their defences, customer awareness remains the first line of protection against these digital threats.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Is TigerWit a scam? Review of revoked licenses, unregulated status, MT4 claims, WikiFX complaints & trader withdrawal risks. Hundreds of traders are questioning whether TigerWit is safe in 2025.

[Dec 2025, Dubai] Trade W announces its Official Global Trading Partnership with Wolverhampton Wanderers FC for the 2025/2026 Premier League season, marking a major milestone in the company’s long term brand expansion strategy.

WikiFX Golden Insight Award uniting industry forces to build a safe and healthy forex ecosystem, driving industry innovation and sustainable development, launches a new feature series — “Voices of the Golden Insight Awards Jury.” Through in-depth conversations with distinguished judges, this series explores the evolving landscape of the forex industry and the shared mission to promote innovation, ethics, and sustainability.

In a competitive online trading space, few companies can claim a history as long as AMarkets. Started in 2007, this broker has helped over three million clients and built a strong presence, especially in CIS, Asian, and Latin American markets. What makes it appealing is clear right away: very high leverage, many different account types, and an excellent 4.8-star rating on Trustpilot based on reviews from over 3,000 users so far. These features show a popular and seemingly trustworthy trading partner. However, a closer look shows a basic problem that traders may face. Behind the attractive features and positive user opinions lies a major concern: AMarkets works only under offshore regulation. It doesn't have licenses from any top-level regulatory bodies like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (Cyprus). This AMarkets Review 2025 aims to break down this contradiction. We will provide a complete analysis based on verified facts, looking at the broker's safety measures, trading condi