WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:UK’s FCA adds six firms to its warning list, including five unlicensed companies and one clone scam.

The UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) has added six new entries to its warning list, highlighting firms that are either operating without proper authorisation or impersonating legitimate financial entities. These actions aim to protect investors from increasingly sophisticated scams circulating online.
According to the FCA, the following five firms are conducting financial activities without regulatory approval:
These entities are offering trading or investment services without being registered with the FCA—a legal requirement for operating within the UK. Investors dealing with these firms are unlikely to be covered by regulatory protections such as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS) or the Financial Ombudsman Service.
The FCA warns that despite professional-looking websites and promises of high returns, these firms pose significant risks to consumers, especially as they fall outside the regulatory perimeter.
In a more deceptive twist, the FCA also flagged mfnclaims.support as a clone firm, meaning scammers are fraudulently using the identity of a legitimate FCA-authorised company to gain trust.
Clone firms often adopt similar names, branding, or website structures to mislead victims into believing theyre dealing with a regulated business. The FCA urges all investors to verify firm details using the FCA Register before making any transactions.
If a company isn‘t listed on the FCA Register or shows warning signs such as unsolicited contact, unclear terms, or unreachable customer service, it’s likely unsafe. Always double-check details and be wary of firms operating without proper oversight.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.