简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：CySEC alerts investors about four unlicensed investment firms operating without authorisation under Cyprus law.
The Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) has issued a public warning against four investment firms found operating without proper authorization.
The firms identified by the regulator are icinvesting.com, nessfx.net, addsmarket.com, and ironvale.pro. According to CySEC, these entities are not licensed or regulated under Article 5 of Law 87(I)/2017, which governs the provision of investment services and activities in Cyprus.
CySEC emphasized that these websites do not belong to any company authorized to provide investment or ancillary services. The watchdog cautioned investors to remain vigilant and verify the legitimacy of firms before engaging in any financial transactions.
To help investors avoid fraudulent activity, CySEC recommends visiting its official website at www.cysec.gov.cy, where a register of licensed investment firms is regularly updated.
As the national financial regulator, CySEC oversees the capital markets and investment firms operating in Cyprus. Its mission is to protect investors, ensure market transparency, and uphold the integrity of the financial sector.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.
Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.
When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
