GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Despite holding a recognized license in Hong Kong and maintaining a seemingly high score on some metrics due to its establishment year, the broker JRJR (金荣中国) has become the subject of an alarming volume of trader complaints. In the last three months alone, WikiFX has received over 141 individual complaints. The core risk isn't just market volatility—it is a systematic pattern of behavior that suggests trading conditions may be manipulated to ensure client losses, coupled with a refusal to process withdrawals for profitable accounts.

Is JRJR safe? Our investigation uncovers a disturbing pattern of severe slippage, frozen accounts, and withdrawal failures hiding behind a Hong Kong license.
Despite holding a recognized license in Hong Kong and maintaining a seemingly high score on some metrics due to its establishment year, the broker JRJR (金荣中国) has become the subject of an alarming volume of trader complaints. In the last three months alone, WikiFX has received over 141 individual complaints. The core risk isn't just market volatility—it is a systematic pattern of behavior that suggests trading conditions may be manipulated to ensure client losses, coupled with a refusal to process withdrawals for profitable accounts.
All cases cited in this article are based on real records submitted to the WikiFX Exposure Center. To protect the privacy of the individuals involved, personal identities have been anonymized.
For a trader, there is nothing more terrifying than watching the market move in your favor, only to have the platform trigger a loss. Our review of recent user feedback indicates that JRJR users are suffering from what appears to be “artificial” slippage.
Multiple users have reported that the price quotes on the JRJR platform often deviate significantly from the broader international market. One trader (Case 24) detailed a scenario where they set a stop-loss at 2370. The market high was only 2369.83—yet their position was liquidated. The trader noted, “If it was a difference of 5 or 10 points, I could accept it. But a difference of 17 points just to hit my stop loss? This looks intentional.”
Another user (Case 3) provided a harrowing account of the platform's price sweeping up and down aggressively within minutes, hitting a high that didn't exist on other platforms, specifically to wipe out their sell position. This phenomenon, often referred to as “stop hunting,” is highly irregular for a compliant broker.

Furthermore, technical instability seems to strike at the most convenient times for the broker. A trader from South Africa (Case 26) reported that the platform has a “habit of freezing up” during critical market movements, preventing them from closing positions and managing risk. This “system paralysis” effectively locks traders into losses.
While technical issues can sometimes be attributed to poor infrastructure, the inability to withdraw funds is a hallmark of high-risk financial conduct. Our investigation into JRJR reveals a widespread withdrawal problem.
Traders are reporting that small withdrawals (often under $1,000) are sometimes processed to build trust. However, once a trader generates significant profits or attempts to withdraw a larger principal, the doors slam shut.
We received a report (Case 18) from a user who deposited $500. After losses, they attempted to withdraw the remaining $20 balance, only to find their account frozen. The customer service response was to disconnect the chat. If a broker refuses to return even $20, the risk to larger capital is immense.
More concerning are the allegations of aggressive account closures. One trader (Case 16) stated, “The black platform froze my account to prevent withdrawal and then maliciously cancelled my account.” Another user (Case 8) recorded their screen showing a profitable position that the platform refused to let them close. Moments later, the system forced a close at a price that never existed on the market, turning a profit into a loss, followed by an immediate account ban to “destroy the evidence.”

Many traders are confused. How can a broker like JRJR, which claims to be regulated in Hong Kong, engage in such behavior? The answer lies in the type of regulation.
WikiFX regulatory records show that JRJR (Gold / Upway) is regulated by the Chinese Gold & Silver Exchange Society (CGSE / HKGX).
While this is a legitimate organization, it is a self-regulatory body, not a statutory government regulator like the UK's FCA or Australia's ASIC. The CGSE primarily manages the conduct of bullion trading among its members. Critically, it does not offer the same level of statutory investor compensation funds or strict legal enforcement regarding software manipulation that a government securities regulator would.
For traders—especially those in Africa or outside Hong Kong—this means if JRJR acts unethically, your avenues for legal recourse or fund recovery through the regulator are extremely limited compared to a broker regulated by the SFC (Securities and Futures Commission).
| Regulator Name | License Type | Current Status |
|---|---|---|
| Hong Kong Gold and Silver Exchange Society (HKGX) | AA Type License (No. 084) | Regulated |
Note: While the status is “Regulated,” the high volume of complaints regarding slippage and withdrawals suggests the broker may be operating significantly outside industry best practices.
The disconnect between JRJR's longevity (established 2017) and the current user experience is stark. The complaints are not isolated technical glitches; they form a pattern of withdrawal problems, unexplained slippage, and hostile customer service.
For traders asking “is JRJR safe?”, the evidence provided by the trading community suggests a resounding caution. The platform appears to function less like a neutral market gateway and more like an adversary that holds the kill switch on your trades and the lock on your wallet.

The level of protection offered by different regulators varies significantly. Trading forex and leveraged financial instruments involves a high level of risk and may not be suitable for all investors.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

Long Asia Group, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker, has come under increasing scrutiny as a growing number of traders report troubling experiences with the broker’s operations. User feedback highlights recurring issues such as delayed or blocked withdrawals, sudden communication breakdowns, and a lack of clear accountability once funds are deposited. Several traders claim that while small withdrawals may initially go through, larger payout requests often face unexplained obstacles. More concerning are allegations suggesting that the broker may no longer be operating transparently, with users reporting prolonged silence, unresolved complaints and suspected fund mishandling. These patterns have raised serious questions about Long Asia Group’s reliability and overall legitimacy, prompting traders to exercise extreme caution before engaging with the broker. For more details, keep reading this LONG ASIA review article, where we have elaborated on the traders’ pain wit

Has your MY MAA MARKETS forex trading experience been nothing short of a financial misery? Do you fail to gain the forex broker’s approval for fund withdrawals? Were you denied withdrawals on the grounds of fake accusations concerning system abuse and hedging? Does the broker deliberately cause you unwarranted slippage as you start executing winning trades? Do you feel the broker is unregulated? Your concerns seem genuine, as many traders have accused the broker of serious financial misconduct. In this MY MAA MARKETS review article, we have investigated some trader complaints. Take a look!

Selangor police arrested 20 suspects after dismantling three online scam syndicates operating fake job and investment scams across Kajang, Seri Kembangan and Puchong, with multiple devices seized and investigations ongoing.