Breaking: Nonfarm Payrolls benchmark revision to lower US employment by 79,000 through March 2026

According to the preliminary estimate of the Current Employment Statistics (CES) national benchmark revision, Nonfarm employment for March 2026 was -79,000 (-0.1%), the US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) reported on Friday.

“The preliminary benchmark revision for total private employment was -178,000 (-0.1%),” the BLS noted in its official press release.

The final benchmark revision will be issued in February 2027 with the publication of the January 2027 Employment Situation news release.

Market reaction

The US Dollar (USD) outperforms its major rivals in the American session on Friday despite the preliminary negative benchmark revision to Nonfarm employment. Federal Reserve (Fed) Chair Kevin Warsh's hawkish remarks at the Jackson Hole Symposium seems to be the primary driver behind the renewed USD strength. At the time of press, the USD Index was up 0.35% on the day at 99.45.

US Dollar Price Today

The table below shows the percentage change of US Dollar (USD) against listed major currencies today. US Dollar was the strongest against the New Zealand Dollar.

The heat map shows percentage changes of major currencies against each other. The base currency is picked from the left column, while the quote currency is picked from the top row. For example, if you pick the US Dollar from the left column and move along the horizontal line to the Japanese Yen, the percentage change displayed in the box will represent USD (base)/JPY (quote).

Warsh flags unfinished inflation fight as conditions seen too loose

Fed Chair Warsh delivered a distinctly hawkish-leaning message, with a 7.4/10 FXS Speechtracker score standing above the 6.5/10 historical average and underscoring heightened concern about price stability. The insistence that the Fed must be confident underlying inflation is moving to target “or we have work to do,” combined with comments that financial conditions are hard to call restrictive and that recent disinflation has not changed underlying trends, points to a bias toward further or prolonged restraint even as growth, spending, and investment remain solid.

The FXS Fed Sentiment Index was unchanged on the day, holding at 129.70, signaling that the speech keeps the overall Fed stance firmly in hawkish territory despite no incremental shift in the aggregate gauge. The elevated index level, together with the above-baseline FXS Speechtracker score, suggests markets will continue to price a Fed that is more focused on cementing the 2% PCE objective than on easing policy in the near term.

This section below was published as a preview of the preliminary benchmark revisions to Nonfarm Payrolls data at 09:33 GMT.

US investors will watch on Friday a labor market report that is far less familiar than the monthly jobs release but has gained considerable importance following the spectacular revisionsof recent years. The Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) will publish its preliminary estimate of the annual benchmark revision to the payroll employment series for the twelve months ending March at 14:00 GMT.

Behind its particularly technical name, the Preliminary Nonfarm Payrolls (NFP) Benchmark Revision answers a relatively simple question: Has the number of payroll jobs reported month after month by US statisticians accurately reflected the reality of the labor market?

The answer could have implications well beyond the statistics themselves. Another large downward revision would reinforce the view that the US labor market slowdown has been deeper than previously thought, while an upward revision could instead show that job creation has been underestimated.

What is the Nonfarm Payrolls Benchmark Revision?

The monthly US employment report relies, among other sources, on the Current Employment Statistics (CES) survey, which collects data from businesses and government agencies to estimate the number of payroll employees in the United States (US).

Like any survey based on a sample, however, it is subject to a margin of error.Once a year, the Bureau of Labor Statistics therefore compares its estimates with a much more comprehensive dataset, which is the Quarterly Census of Employment and Wages (QCEW).

The QCEW is primarily based on unemployment insurance records that nearly all US employers are required to submit to authorities. Its coverage is much broader than that of the monthly survey, although the data are released with a lag of several months.

The benchmark revision essentially measures the difference between the employment level estimated by the CES survey and the level indicated by this more comprehensive dataset for March.

This distinction is crucial. Friday's figure is not a conventional revision to the NFP number for a particular month, nor does it directly represent the number of jobs created or lost over a year. Instead, it indicates how much the estimated total payroll employment level for the twelve months through March may need to be adjusted.

Importantly, Fridays preliminary estimate will not immediately change the official payroll data. It is the final, benchmark revision, due in February 2027, that will be incorporated into the historical series with the Employment Situation report.

Why Friday's figure is attracting attention

Benchmark revisions used to be relatively modest, but they have become considerably largerin recent years. According to historical data presented by HAAWKS Research, the average absolute preliminary revision to total nonfarm employment was just 0.12% between 2016 and 2020. It increased to 0.34% between 2021 and 2025. Moreover, the 2024 and 2025 revisions were particularly notable.

In September 2025, the BLS estimated that the level of nonfarm employment in March 2025 should be revised downward by 911K jobs, or 0.6%. When the final benchmark revision was incorporated into the data in February 2026, the final March employment level was revised by minus 898K.

Such a big revision raised questionsabout the ability of monthly surveys to accurately measure a labor market transformed by the pandemic, business births and deaths, and declining response rates to statistical surveys.

It also explains why a release once followed mainly by specialists could trigger a much stronger market reaction this year.

Another downward revision? Forecasts are unusually divided

Unlike last year, the available data do not clearly point to a significant overestimation of employment, and estimates ahead of the release are unusually divided. Wells Fargo sees an adjustment of around 100K jobs to the downside, while Pantheon Macroeconomics economists Samuel Tombs and Oliver Allen expect an overstatement of roughly 200K jobs over the 12 months through March 2026.

On the other side of the debate, Commerzbank economist Bernd Weidensteiner expects an upward revision of around 250K jobs, while Guy Berger of MacroMostly also sees a small positive revision as the most likely outcome.

This divergence partly reflects the behavior of the QCEW during 2025. Through December, QCEW employment data tracked the monthly survey figures much more closely than during the periods preceding the large revisions of 2024 and 2025.

However, uncertainty remains high as the QCEW data available ahead of Fridays release only run through December 2025, while preliminary QCEW estimates themselves can subsequently be revised.

A positive revision would not mean the labor market is strong again

This is probably the main trap surrounding Friday's release. The benchmark essentially looks in the rear-view mirror. It will provide a more accurate assessment of the one-year employment level through March 2026, but it will not directly tell investors what has happened since then.

US employment growth has already slowed considerably. According to Commerzbank, average monthly job growth stood at just 32K between August 2025 and July 2026. A positive revision of several hundred thousand jobs could therefore improve the starting level for the year, but it wouldnt challenge the broader conclusion that the labor market has lost momentum this year.

Bernd Weidensteiner highlights precisely this distinction: “While the revision does change the baseline, even if it wont be incorporated into the data until next year, it is unlikely to lead to a reassessment of labor market developments since March.”

The Unemployment Rate, which comes from a separate household survey, is also unaffected by this revision. The benchmark applies to the establishment survey and therefore does not rewrite the entire picture of the US labor market.

What could the revision mean for the Federal Reserve and markets?

The market reaction will probably depend less on whether the revision is positive or negative than on its magnitude. A limited adjustment, whether slightly positive or negative, would support the view that the major discrepancies observed over the past two years have diminished. It could also suggest that methodological improvements to the monthly estimates are producing results that are closer to administrative employment data.

A large positive revision would representa more significant surprise. It would indicate that the US economy had substantially created more jobs than previously reported, potentially easing some concerns about past labor market weakness.

The most market-sensitive scenario, however, would likely be another downward revision of several hundred thousand jobs. Such an outcome would revive questions about the reliability of monthly employment figures and could reinforce the perception that labor demand weakened faster than official statistics initially suggested.

This information would be particularly important for the Federal Reserve (Fed), whose policy decisions depend heavily on the balance between inflation and employment. If investors conclude that the labor market is more fragile than previously estimated, expectations for interest-rate hikes could decrease, weighing down on the US Dollar (USD). Conversely, a significant positive revision could reinforce expectations of hikes, supporting the Greenback.

Friday's figure will not replace the next Nonfarm Payrolls report or the Unemployment Rate. It will answer a different question. Not how many jobs the US economy is creating now, but how much confidence investors should place in the employment levels they were given over the past year.

After the enormous revisions of 2024 and 2025, that question may ultimately prove just as important as the headline number itself.

Economic IndicatorNonfarm Payrolls Benchmark Revision

The US Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) announces the estimate of the annual benchmark revision to the establishment survey employment series, which can lead to a revision as well for the Nonfarm Payrolls data in the twelve months to March. This revision could have implications for employment figures for the rest of the year. The preliminary estimate tends to be released each September, while the final revision is usually published in February.

Next release:Fri Aug 28, 2026 14:00 (Prel)

Frequency:Irregular

Consensus:-

Previous:-

Source:BLS

Nonfarm Payrolls FAQsWhat are Nonfarm Payrolls?

Nonfarm Payrolls (NFP) are part of the US Bureau of Labor Statistics monthly jobs report. The Nonfarm Payrolls component specifically measures the change in the number of people employed in the US during the previous month, excluding the farming industry.

How does Nonfarm Payrolls influence the Federal Reserve monetary policy decisions?

The Nonfarm Payrolls figure can influence the decisions of the Federal Reserve by providing a measure of how successfully the Fed is meeting its mandate of fostering full employment and 2% inflation.

A relatively high NFP figure means more people are in employment, earning more money and therefore probably spending more. A relatively low Nonfarm Payrolls result, on the either hand, could mean people are struggling to find work.

The Fed will typically raise interest rates to combat high inflation triggered by low unemployment, and lower them to stimulate a stagnant labor market.

How does Nonfarm Payrolls affect the US Dollar?

Nonfarm Payrolls generally have a positive correlation with the US Dollar. This means when payrolls figures come out higher-than-expected the USD tends to rally and vice versa when they are lower.

NFPs influence the US Dollar by virtue of their impact on inflation, monetary policy expectations and interest rates. A higher NFP usually means the Federal Reserve will be more tight in its monetary policy, supporting the USD.

How does Nonfarm Payrolls affect Gold?

Nonfarm Payrolls are generally negatively-correlated with the price of Gold. This means a higher-than-expected payrolls figure will have a depressing effect on the Gold price and vice versa.

Higher NFP generally has a positive effect on the value of the USD, and like most major commodities Gold is priced in US Dollars. If the USD gains in value, therefore, it requires less Dollars to buy an ounce of Gold.

Also, higher interest rates (typically helped higher NFPs) also lessen the attractiveness of Gold as an investment compared to staying in cash, where the money will at least earn interest.

Sometimes Nonfarm Payrolls trigger an opposite reaction than what the market expects. Why is that?

Nonfarm Payrolls is only one component within a bigger jobs report and it can be overshadowed by the other components.

At times, when NFP come out higher-than-forecast, but the Average Weekly Earnings is lower than expected, the market has ignored the potentially inflationary effect of the headline result and interpreted the fall in earnings as deflationary.

The Participation Rate and the Average Weekly Hours components can also influence the market reaction, but only in seldom events like the “Great Resignation” or the Global Financial Crisis.