WikiFX

Reply

In my experience reviewing and researching RCG, I found that clear and transparent information regarding inactivity fees was not available from the broker’s primary sources. This lack of disclosure is concerning, particularly given that RCG operates without recognized regulation according to current data. For me, the absence of regulatory oversight means I have to be extremely cautious about potential hidden costs, which could include inactivity or maintenance fees. Responsible brokers typically state inactivity policies upfront, but with RCG, I could not confirm the existence or application of such fees. As someone who values risk management and transparency, I find it essential to only commit funds to brokers that are clear about all charges. In my opinion, until RCG or Leese Trading Group delivers explicit documentation about their account maintenance or inactivity fees, I would avoid leaving funds dormant with this provider. The risk of unexpected deductions or policy changes is higher with unregulated entities, and this is why I always prioritize brokers that communicate all terms openly. For now, I treat the lack of clear inactivity fee policies at RCG as a red flag, and would recommend that others do the same unless they obtain direct, written confirmation from the company.