WikiFX

Reply

Based on my close review of available information for SinoPac Holdings, I was unable to find any clear or detailed disclosure regarding inactivity fees. For me as a trader, this lack of transparency immediately raises concerns. In my years of trading experience, reputable brokers typically outline important details—such as whether inactivity fees are charged—so clients can make informed decisions and properly evaluate the cost of maintaining an account. However, SinoPac Holdings does not provide specifics on account types, fee structures, or the terms under which inactivity-related charges might be imposed. This opacity makes it difficult, if not impossible, to identify the exact circumstances under which any potential inactivity fees could apply. Given SinoPac Holdings is not regulated and has a history of disciplinary action, I approach this broker with added caution. In my judgement, the absence of regulatory oversight and the lack of fee transparency increase risk for retail traders who may be especially vulnerable to undisclosed charges. Until full, official fee schedules are made public and independently verifiable, I cannot assure others that inactivity fees are either present or absent—but I would advise extra diligence and the use of only risk capital if considering any engagement with this broker.