WikiFX

Reply

After carefully reviewing the available information on Renaissance Capital, I couldn’t find any explicit mention of inactivity fees or detailed terms regarding such charges. As a trader who places a strong emphasis on transparency and regulatory compliance, I always look for clear disclosures on all potential costs, particularly those that could affect dormant accounts. Given Renaissance Capital’s CYSEC regulation and its status as a long-established investment firm, I would typically expect such information to be easily accessible; however, the lack of specific terms around inactivity fees—at least in the publicly available material—raises some caution for me. Additionally, the platform’s WikiFX page highlights numerous user reports of withdrawal difficulties and allegations of connections to previous problematic entities, which compounds my sense of risk. In my experience, ambiguous or incomplete fee schedules can sometimes accompany operational issues. Thus, before committing any funds, I would recommend contacting Renaissance Capital’s customer support directly and requesting written confirmation about all possible fees, including those related to inactive accounts. For me, full fee transparency is non-negotiable, especially in an environment where trust has already been called into question by user exposure reports.