世界のFX会社情報をかんたん検索
WikiFX
ABOUT US
WikiFXは、先進技術を活用してFX投資をよりシンプルで安全にし、FX投資のセキュリティに関する技術サービスのリーダーを目指しています。
INTRODUCTION TO WikiFX
私たちについて
2017年に設立されたWikiFXは、世界最大級ブローカーデータベースを持つFX情報サービスプラットフォームのリーディングカンパニーです。
2018年2月にWikiFXアプリが正式にリリースされ、世界中のユーザーに17の言語で、よりシンプルで安全な外国為替業界の情報と照会サービスを提供しています。
2018年2月にWikiFXアプリが正式にリリースされ、世界中のユーザーに17の言語で、よりシンプルで安全な外国為替業界の情報と照会サービスを提供しています。
65,000+
FX会社に関する照会サービス
60+
収録した規制機関
240+
国と地域
2,100,000+
サービス利用者数
ADVANTAGES OF WikiFX
得意分野
WikiFX評価システム
当社の革新的なWikiFX評価システムは、先進的なアルゴリズムと視覚的なチャートを用いて、ブローカーの資格、ユーザーレビュー、業界への影響を評価します。
世界最大級データベース
世界最大のFXブローカーデータベースを備え、企業の資格情報、規制状況、過去の業績、ユーザーレビュー、リスク評価などの確認済み情報を網羅しています。
現地調査と評価
当社はブローカーの業務に対して現地検査を行い、オフィスのスペースやチームの規模、その他の詳細を公開情報と照らし合わせて確認します。これにより、業者の信頼性や実力を直接評価しています。
WikiFX SERVICE
当社のサービス
プラットフォーム検証
当社は、ブローカーの規制状況やライセンス、リスク情報、信用評価、現地検査に関するリアルタイムの更新を通じて、投資家に包括的な洞察を提供しています。これにより、業界の透明性と標準化を促進し、より公平で安全な市場環境を構築します。
業界コミュニティ
当社はユーザーのためにパーソナライズされたアイデンティティを提供し、彼らが自分自身のFXエコシステムを見つけられるようサポートしています。ユーザーは詳細なサービス提供者の情報にアクセスし、交流を深めることで、より健全で信頼性の高い業界環境を育んでいます。
サービス製品
WikiFX VPSは、FX投資家向けに設計された強力なEAクラウドサーバーです。ユーザーは、さまざまな市場動向に対応した主流のアルゴリズムや分析ツールを含むEA戦略製品からも選ぶことができます。
WikiFX IN ACTION
私たちの行動
1.5W人の投資家が6500Wの損失を取り戻すのを支援しました。
WikiFXは透明性の窓口として、ホワイトラベル、共有ライセンス、リスク情報を詳細に記録しています。私たちは無料で効率的な苦情処理のチャネルを提供し、迅速かつ正確に解決することで、経済的損失の回復や不正行為の暴露を支援しています。
300+社の評判を守り、「悪貨は良貨を駆逐する」ことを促進しました。
WikiFXは市場に対して常に高い関心を持ち、第三者の客観性と専門知識を活用して、評価システムや現地調査を通じて潜在的なリスクを明らかにし、不正な行為を効果的に抑制しています。
The platform's own role positioning
WikiFX's Role and Positioning
Is WikiFX a trading platform?
No. WikiFX is not a trading platform and does not provide any form of trading or financial services.
WikiFX is a third‑party forex information service platform, primarily offering the following to investors and industry professionals:
Regulatory status and license information of global forex brokers
Broker background checks and compliance qualification verification
User reviews and complaint exposure
Market insights and industry data
Risk alerts and monitoring tools
WikiFX does not provide:
Fund deposit/withdrawal services
Trade order placement or matching
Payment, clearing, or asset management services
Is WikiFX neutral?
Yes. WikiFX is a fully independent, third‑party forex information service platform that maintains a neutral stance.
1. Financial independence: Since its establishment, WikiFX has not accepted any funding from external investment institutions, brokers, or affiliated parties, ensuring that capital sources do not influence the platform’s judgment.
2. Operational independence: WikiFX operates as an independent enterprise and is not affiliated with any regulatory or financial institution in any country/region.
3. Business model: WikiFX's core value is built on the objectivity, fairness, and verifiability of its data presentation. Maintaining neutrality is fundamental to its existence; providing biased ratings or coverage for any institution would undermine its long‑term development.
Is WikiFX recognized or regulated by any financial regulatory authority? Is it itself an independent regulatory platform?
WikiFX is not a financial regulatory authority and does not possess regulatory qualifications. WikiFX is a third‑party information inquiry platform—a supervisor, not a regulator.
WikiFX’s relevant functions include:
Querying regulatory information (from the public databases of over 60 regulatory authorities worldwide)
Providing user complaint channels (registered users with real‑account binding + verifiable evidence)
Helping users understand whether a broker holds valid licenses (one‑stop query, regularly updated)
How does WikiFX generate revenue? Does its business model affect its impartiality?
Not only does it not affect impartiality, but as an information service platform, WikiFX’s commercial value is precisely derived from the objectivity and fairness of its information presentation.
WikiFX’s revenue mainly comes from:
Exhibitions / industry events
Media advertising services
Data services and industry reports
Self‑developed technical services such as VPS and SAAS
Important clarifications:
WikiFX does not participate intrading, does not earn any form of trading commissions, and does not charge individual users any fees during services such as rights protection or exposure.
WikiFX Scoring is based on publicly available information, with calculation rules following uniform standards and not influenced by paid collaborations.
Reviews on WikiFX undergo strict verification and cannot be deleted or modified through payment.
The accuracy and fairness of the rating
Accuracy and Fairness of Scores
Are WikiFX's data sources independent and verifiable?
Yes. All data on WikiFX come from independent, publicly available, and verifiable authoritative sources. The data/information sources for the five major dimensions of WikiFX Scores mainly include:
License Index: Official websites of national financial regulatory authorities, license registration databases, permit query systems
Regulation Index: Regulatory authority official announcements, enforcement documents, risk warnings, and official media channel information
Business Index: Public information from broker websites, third‑party business data monitoring, authoritative media reports, etc.
Risk Control Index: WikiFX Complaint Center, Major negative public sentiment, Brand health monitoring, etc.
Software Index: Third‑party "platform application performance" monitoringtools, WikiFX user's software‑related reviews, user feedback from app stores, etc.
Can forex brokers request corrections to their information on WikiFX? Is this process transparent?
Yes. WikiFX provides a "Review Request" mechanism: Brokers can submit relevant evidence via publicly disclosed channels such as the email address listed on the WikiFX website. The platform will update the information after verification.
Are WikiFX Scores influenced by commercial interests? Can forex brokers pay to improve their WikiFX Score?
No—commercial cooperation cannot influence WikiFX Scores.
However, certain actions that help protect investor trading safety and can be monitored and verified by WikiFX may allow brokers to improve their scores more quickly. Examples include: more complete information disclosure, more timely response to complaints, etc.
The following behaviors may affect WikiFX Scores:
License Index:
—— If a broker provides supplementary verifiable license information, the score for this indicator may increase after verification. (Prerequisite for increase: must come from an authoritative regulatory body and be verifiable.)
Risk Control Index:
—— If a broker signs a commitment agreement with WikiFX to effectively handle complaints within 7 working days, providing users with additional risk control protection, it may temporarily avoid the impact of such complaints on this indicator score.Once any breach of agreement or expiration is detected, the score will beimmediately adjusted. (Prerequisite for increase: user risk is reduced, and event resolution is trackable.)
Business Index:
—— If a broker frequently discloses its operational model and development direction through media, enhancing business transparency, it may help increase the score in this dimension. (Prerequisite for increase: media content is publicly verifiable and not merely self‑declared by the broker.)
Software Index:
—— Providing third‑party monitoring channels for trading service stability, enriching high‑quality software service types (e.g., MT4, MT5, proprietary platforms), and improving system stability and user experience can help increase the score for this indicator. (Prerequisite for increase: service capability is enhanced, and WikiFX can monitor relevant data.)
Note:
The Regulation Index is completely non‑influenceable.
—— It is derived solely from the public information channels of financial regulatory authorities; supplementary information from any other channels cannot affect this score.
Why do brokers’ scores change continuously?
A broker’s WikiFX Score is updated in real time based on the latest information to ensure the score reflects the platform’s most recent operational status.
The score is affected by comprehensive factors such as changes in regulatory information, public sentiment monitoring, on‑site verification, etc. WikiFX Scores are dynamically updated and maintained, resulting from uniform algorithmic calculations and not subject to human intervention.
If a broker’s score remains unchanged for an extended period, it may indicate outdated information, significantly reducing its reference value—a major flaw for financial professionals and investors. Therefore, dynamic score updates are normal and ensure the timeliness and reliability of WikiFX Scores.
Why does the same broker show different scores when switching regions?
Due to differences in local regulatory policies, user feedback, and market performance, scores are localized to ensure users see real‑time conditions more aligned with their local market.
For example:
A broker holds a local license in Region A but has received a public warning from the financial regulator in Region B.
A broker has recent concentrated complaints in Region A but maintains a long‑term good reputation in Region B.
A broker has been stably operating in Region A for ten years but has just entered Region B and is in the initial business development stage.
Are WikiFX Scores accurate? Why do some large, licensed brokers have low scores, while some lesser‑known small brokers have high scores?
Licenses are only one dimension in evaluating a broker. In the global forex industry, “being licensed ≠ absolute safety.” There have been historical cases of licensed brokers collapsing, causing fund losses, or facing regulatory penalties. Therefore, besides the License Index, WikiFX Scoring system incorporates four other dimensions for comprehensive assessment.
Some large, licensed brokers may have low scores not because “licenses are unimportant,” but because they have deductions in dimensions such as public sentiment risk, user complaints, software stability, or regulatory penalties.
Some smaller or lesser‑known brokers may have high scores not because “greater fame = higher score,” but due to recent good compliance, few complaints, and absence of risk records.
The authenticity of user reviews
Authenticity of User Reviews
Are user reviews on WikiFX trustworthy? Are there cases of fabricated positive reviews or malicious negative reviews?
WikiFX has established an industry‑leading review verification system and continuously iterates it.
Multi‑layered risk control mechanisms: In addition to adopting anti‑fraud mechanisms commonly used by mainstream global review platforms (e.g., IP detection, behavior tracking), WikiFX further implements industry‑specific verification strategies:
Positive reviews require “real‑account binding verification” (except for exposure complaints, users must bind a real trading account before posting a review; the system verifies whether the account matches the reviewed broker. This effectively confirms whether the reviewer has genuine investment experience with the evaluated entity).
Negative reviews require verifiable evidence, such as transaction records of deposits/withdrawals from the trading backend, official customer service communication records, etc. Negative reviews without evidence are directly rejected.
Dual manual and technical review: Suspicious reviews triggered by the system are intercepted and re‑checked by a manual team to ensure the objectivity and reliability of review content.
Through this strict end‑to‑end process, WikiFX maximizes the assurance that platform reviews come from real users, ensuring “high‑value positive reviews · genuine‑evidence negative reviews,” providing global investors with professional, objective, and trustworthy reference material.
Why have some negative reviews I saw before disappeared? Does WikiFX charge to delete user negative reviews?
Resolving the concerned party’s issue is the only possible reason for deleting a negative review.
Unless confirmed by the user themselves, WikiFX does not authorize anyone to delete reviews.
Authentic user reviews are the foundation of WikiFX’s existence. WikiFX has never and will never charge fees to delete reviews.
Cooperative brokers do not enjoy the privilege of deleting reviews! To encourage brokers to actively respond to investor concerns, WikiFX provides a “Complaint Processing Period”:
Once it is confirmed that a broker has begun handling a complaint, the relevant complaint content will be temporarily withheld from public display during the processing period.
The related review is not deleted. The platform actively tracks the progress ofresolution.
Once processing is complete, the review is automatically restored to public view, and resolved matters are marked as “Resolved.”
Supplementary Explanation Regarding the Complaint Processing Period：
1. Nature of the Complaint Processing Period
2. The Complaint Processing Period is not a “privilege” for partners but exists because they proactively authorize WikiFX to supervise the entire complaint‑handling process. WikiFX provides real‑time feedback on complaint status to partners and actively facilitates communication. This serves both as a service to partners and as a safeguard for investor rights. WikiFX strictly verifies evidence submitted by enterprises, such as refund proof, settlement agreements, and communication records, to ensure issues are genuinely being resolved.
3. Why Non‑Partners Do Not Have a Processing Period？
4. Non‑partner enterprises have not opened their complaint‑handling processes to WikiFX. WikiFX cannot confirm their willingness or progress in resolution. If the user does not voluntarily withdraw the complaint, WikiFX has no right to unilaterally hide the content, as doing so might conceal risks.
Are user reviews anonymous?
Users are anonymous to the public, and their privacy is protected, but the authenticity of reviews can be verified by the platform. WikiFX’s review system employs a strict content verification mechanism: •Positive reviews must be bound to a real and valid trading account that matches the reviewed entity. •Negative reviews (exposures) must provide genuine, relevant evidence and pass manual verification.