회사 소개 - WikiFX

INTRODUCTION TO WikiFX

WikiFX이란?

2017년에 설립된 WikiFX는 세계 최대 규모의 브로커 데이터베이스를 보유한 선도적인 외환 정보 서비스 플랫폼입니다.

2018년 2월, WikiFX 앱이 공식적으로 런칭되어 전 세계 유저들에게 17개 언어로 된 더 간편하고 안전한 외환 산업 정보와 규제 조회 서비스를 제공해 왔습니다.

65,000+
외환 브로커 검증 서비스
60+
수록된 규제 기관
240+
국가 및 지역
2,100,000+
서비스된 유저 수

ADVANTAGES OF WikiFX

WikiFX의 우세

WikiFX 점수 시스템
저희의 선구적인 평가 시스템은 고급 알고리즘과 직관적인 형식을 사용하여 브로커의 자격, 유저 리뷰 및 업계 영향력을 평가합니다.
가장 큰 데이터베이스
회사 자격 증명, 규제 상태, 과거 실적, 유저 리뷰 및 위험 등급과 같은 검증된 정보를 포괄하는 세계 최대 규모의 외환 브로커 데이터베이스를 제공합니다.
현장 조사
WikiFX는 공개된 정보를 바탕으로 사무실 공간, 회사 규모 및 기타 세부 사항을 확인하기 위해 브로커의 운영에 대한 현장 조사를 실시하며, 브로커의 신뢰성과 강도를 직접 평가합니다.

WikiFX SERVICE

WikiFX의 서비스

플랫폼 검증
WikiFX는 브로커의 규제 상태, 라이선스, 리스크 정보, 신용 평가 및 현지조사에 대한 실시간 업데이트를 통해 투자자들에게 종합적인 인사이트를 제공하여 업계의 투명성과 표준화를 촉진합니다.

업계 커뮤니티
유저가 자신만의 외환 생태계를 찾을 수 있도록 개인화된 캐릭터을 생성합니다. 유저는 자세한 서비스 제공자 정보에 액세스하고 상호 작용에 참여하여 활기차고 신뢰할 수 있는 외환 커뮤니티를 조성할 수 있습니다.

서비스 제품
WikiFX VPS는 외환 투자자를 위해 설계된 강력한 EA 클라우드 서버입니다. 유저는 다양한 시장 동향에 대한 주류 알고리즘과 분석 도구를 다루는 EA 전략 제품도 선택할 수 있습니다.

WikiFX IN ACTION

WikiFX의 액션

1.5W명의 투자자가 6500W달러 이상의 손실을 되찾도록 도왔습니다.

WikiFX는 화이트 라벨, 라이선스 공유, 폭로 정보를 꼼꼼하게 기록하여 투명성을 확보하는 창구 역할을 합니다. 저희는 무료이고 효율적인 불만 해결 채널을 제공하여 경제적 손실을 되찾고 사기성 활동을 폭로할 수 있도록 신속하고 정확한 해결책을 제공합니다.

300+개 기업의 평판을 보호했으며 "악화가 양화를 구축한다"는 것을 피한다.

WikiFX는 제3자로써 객관성과 전문성을 활용하여 평가 시스템과 현지조사를 통해 잠재적인 위험을 발견하고 비윤리적 관행을 효과적으로 억제하는 등 시장에 대한 높은 관심을 유지하고 있습니다.

The platform's own role positioning

WikiFX's Role and Positioning

Is WikiFX a trading platform?

No. WikiFX is not a trading platform and does not provide any form of trading or financial services.

WikiFX is a third‑party forex information service platform, primarily offering the following to investors and industry professionals:

Regulatory status and license information of global forex brokers

Broker background checks and compliance qualification verification

User reviews and complaint exposure

Market insights and industry data

Risk alerts and monitoring tools

WikiFX does not provide:

Fund deposit/withdrawal services

Trade order placement or matching

Payment, clearing, or asset management services

Is WikiFX neutral?

Yes. WikiFX is a fully independent, third‑party forex information service platform that maintains a neutral stance.

1. Financial independence: Since its establishment, WikiFX has not accepted any funding from external investment institutions, brokers, or affiliated parties, ensuring that capital sources do not influence the platform’s judgment.

2. Operational independence: WikiFX operates as an independent enterprise and is not affiliated with any regulatory or financial institution in any country/region.

3. Business model: WikiFX's core value is built on the objectivity, fairness, and verifiability of its data presentation. Maintaining neutrality is fundamental to its existence; providing biased ratings or coverage for any institution would undermine its long‑term development.

Is WikiFX recognized or regulated by any financial regulatory authority? Is it itself an independent regulatory platform?

WikiFX is not a financial regulatory authority and does not possess regulatory qualifications. WikiFX is a third‑party information inquiry platform—a supervisor, not a regulator.

WikiFX’s relevant functions include:

Querying regulatory information (from the public databases of over 60 regulatory authorities worldwide)

Providing user complaint channels (registered users with real‑account binding + verifiable evidence)

Helping users understand whether a broker holds valid licenses (one‑stop query, regularly updated)

How does WikiFX generate revenue? Does its business model affect its impartiality?

Not only does it not affect impartiality, but as an information service platform, WikiFX’s commercial value is precisely derived from the objectivity and fairness of its information presentation.

WikiFX’s revenue mainly comes from:

Exhibitions / industry events

Media advertising services

Data services and industry reports

Self‑developed technical services such as VPS and SAAS

Important clarifications:

WikiFX does not participate intrading, does not earn any form of trading commissions, and does not charge individual users any fees during services such as rights protection or exposure.

WikiFX Scoring is based on publicly available information, with calculation rules following uniform standards and not influenced by paid collaborations.

Reviews on WikiFX undergo strict verification and cannot be deleted or modified through payment.

The accuracy and fairness of the rating

Accuracy and Fairness of Scores

Are WikiFX's data sources independent and verifiable?

Yes. All data on WikiFX come from independent, publicly available, and verifiable authoritative sources. The data/information sources for the five major dimensions of WikiFX Scores mainly include:

License Index: Official websites of national financial regulatory authorities, license registration databases, permit query systems

Regulation Index: Regulatory authority official announcements, enforcement documents, risk warnings, and official media channel information

Business Index: Public information from broker websites, third‑party business data monitoring, authoritative media reports, etc.

Risk Control Index: WikiFX Complaint Center, Major negative public sentiment, Brand health monitoring, etc.

Software Index: Third‑party "platform application performance" monitoringtools, WikiFX user's software‑related reviews, user feedback from app stores, etc.

Can forex brokers request corrections to their information on WikiFX? Is this process transparent?

Yes. WikiFX provides a "Review Request" mechanism: Brokers can submit relevant evidence via publicly disclosed channels such as the email address listed on the WikiFX website. The platform will update the information after verification.

Are WikiFX Scores influenced by commercial interests? Can forex brokers pay to improve their WikiFX Score?

No—commercial cooperation cannot influence WikiFX Scores.

However, certain actions that help protect investor trading safety and can be monitored and verified by WikiFX may allow brokers to improve their scores more quickly. Examples include: more complete information disclosure, more timely response to complaints, etc.

The following behaviors may affect WikiFX Scores:

License Index:

—— If a broker provides supplementary verifiable license information, the score for this indicator may increase after verification. (Prerequisite for increase: must come from an authoritative regulatory body and be verifiable.)

Risk Control Index:

—— If a broker signs a commitment agreement with WikiFX to effectively handle complaints within 7 working days, providing users with additional risk control protection, it may temporarily avoid the impact of such complaints on this indicator score.Once any breach of agreement or expiration is detected, the score will beimmediately adjusted. (Prerequisite for increase: user risk is reduced, and event resolution is trackable.)

Business Index:

—— If a broker frequently discloses its operational model and development direction through media, enhancing business transparency, it may help increase the score in this dimension. (Prerequisite for increase: media content is publicly verifiable and not merely self‑declared by the broker.)

Software Index:

—— Providing third‑party monitoring channels for trading service stability, enriching high‑quality software service types (e.g., MT4, MT5, proprietary platforms), and improving system stability and user experience can help increase the score for this indicator. (Prerequisite for increase: service capability is enhanced, and WikiFX can monitor relevant data.)

Note:

The Regulation Index is completely non‑influenceable.

—— It is derived solely from the public information channels of financial regulatory authorities; supplementary information from any other channels cannot affect this score.

Why do brokers’ scores change continuously?

A broker’s WikiFX Score is updated in real time based on the latest information to ensure the score reflects the platform’s most recent operational status.

The score is affected by comprehensive factors such as changes in regulatory information, public sentiment monitoring, on‑site verification, etc. WikiFX Scores are dynamically updated and maintained, resulting from uniform algorithmic calculations and not subject to human intervention.

If a broker’s score remains unchanged for an extended period, it may indicate outdated information, significantly reducing its reference value—a major flaw for financial professionals and investors. Therefore, dynamic score updates are normal and ensure the timeliness and reliability of WikiFX Scores.

Why does the same broker show different scores when switching regions?

Due to differences in local regulatory policies, user feedback, and market performance, scores are localized to ensure users see real‑time conditions more aligned with their local market.

For example:

A broker holds a local license in Region A but has received a public warning from the financial regulator in Region B.

A broker has recent concentrated complaints in Region A but maintains a long‑term good reputation in Region B.

A broker has been stably operating in Region A for ten years but has just entered Region B and is in the initial business development stage.

Are WikiFX Scores accurate? Why do some large, licensed brokers have low scores, while some lesser‑known small brokers have high scores?

Licenses are only one dimension in evaluating a broker. In the global forex industry, “being licensed ≠ absolute safety.” There have been historical cases of licensed brokers collapsing, causing fund losses, or facing regulatory penalties. Therefore, besides the License Index, WikiFX Scoring system incorporates four other dimensions for comprehensive assessment.

Some large, licensed brokers may have low scores not because “licenses are unimportant,” but because they have deductions in dimensions such as public sentiment risk, user complaints, software stability, or regulatory penalties.

Some smaller or lesser‑known brokers may have high scores not because “greater fame = higher score,” but due to recent good compliance, few complaints, and absence of risk records.

The authenticity of user reviews

Authenticity of User Reviews

Are user reviews on WikiFX trustworthy? Are there cases of fabricated positive reviews or malicious negative reviews?

WikiFX has established an industry‑leading review verification system and continuously iterates it.

Multi‑layered risk control mechanisms: In addition to adopting anti‑fraud mechanisms commonly used by mainstream global review platforms (e.g., IP detection, behavior tracking), WikiFX further implements industry‑specific verification strategies:

Positive reviews require “real‑account binding verification” (except for exposure complaints, users must bind a real trading account before posting a review; the system verifies whether the account matches the reviewed broker. This effectively confirms whether the reviewer has genuine investment experience with the evaluated entity).

Negative reviews require verifiable evidence, such as transaction records of deposits/withdrawals from the trading backend, official customer service communication records, etc. Negative reviews without evidence are directly rejected.

Dual manual and technical review: Suspicious reviews triggered by the system are intercepted and re‑checked by a manual team to ensure the objectivity and reliability of review content.

Through this strict end‑to‑end process, WikiFX maximizes the assurance that platform reviews come from real users, ensuring “high‑value positive reviews · genuine‑evidence negative reviews,” providing global investors with professional, objective, and trustworthy reference material.

Why have some negative reviews I saw before disappeared? Does WikiFX charge to delete user negative reviews?

Resolving the concerned party’s issue is the only possible reason for deleting a negative review.

Unless confirmed by the user themselves, WikiFX does not authorize anyone to delete reviews.

Authentic user reviews are the foundation of WikiFX’s existence. WikiFX has never and will never charge fees to delete reviews.

Cooperative brokers do not enjoy the privilege of deleting reviews! To encourage brokers to actively respond to investor concerns, WikiFX provides a “Complaint Processing Period”:

Once it is confirmed that a broker has begun handling a complaint, the relevant complaint content will be temporarily withheld from public display during the processing period.

The related review is not deleted. The platform actively tracks the progress ofresolution.

Once processing is complete, the review is automatically restored to public view, and resolved matters are marked as “Resolved.”

Supplementary Explanation Regarding the Complaint Processing Period：

1. Nature of the Complaint Processing Period

2. The Complaint Processing Period is not a “privilege” for partners but exists because they proactively authorize WikiFX to supervise the entire complaint‑handling process. WikiFX provides real‑time feedback on complaint status to partners and actively facilitates communication. This serves both as a service to partners and as a safeguard for investor rights. WikiFX strictly verifies evidence submitted by enterprises, such as refund proof, settlement agreements, and communication records, to ensure issues are genuinely being resolved.

3. Why Non‑Partners Do Not Have a Processing Period？

4. Non‑partner enterprises have not opened their complaint‑handling processes to WikiFX. WikiFX cannot confirm their willingness or progress in resolution. If the user does not voluntarily withdraw the complaint, WikiFX has no right to unilaterally hide the content, as doing so might conceal risks.

Are user reviews anonymous?

Users are anonymous to the public, and their privacy is protected, but the authenticity of reviews can be verified by the platform. WikiFX’s review system employs a strict content verification mechanism: •Positive reviews must be bound to a real and valid trading account that matches the reviewed entity. •Negative reviews (exposures) must provide genuine, relevant evidence and pass manual verification.

ABOUT US