Leverate · 利瑞

Based on my own careful review and experience with broker research, I can say Leverate does not offer a swap-free Islamic account for individual traders. In fact, this is largely due to the very structure of their business, as Leverate is not a retail broker at all. Their core services are aimed strictly at other businesses, brokerage firms, or institutional clients rather than individuals seeking to open trading accounts. From their documentation and available information, Leverate specializes in technology and liquidity solutions—providing software, risk management tools, and platforms like MT4 and Sirix to brokers and prop firms. They are not involved in direct client trading, account management, or individual trading services. Furthermore, the risks flagged around their regulatory status and recent removal from CySEC’s Investor Compensation Fund only reinforce my caution: I would not recommend pursuing any trading account, swap-free or otherwise, with Leverate if you are an individual trader. It’s essential in forex to ensure any account type, especially something as specific as a swap-free Islamic account, is offered clearly and transparently by a regulated firm that serves retail clients. In my professional view, Leverate simply does not fit that description.

As an experienced forex trader, I always make fund safety my top priority when evaluating any broker or technology provider. With Leverate, I took extra care in assessing their regulatory claims and operational structure. According to the evidence I reviewed, Leverate presents a complex picture with notable red flags. While they claim ties to CySEC and reference a specific license number, the available information strongly suggests that their regulatory standing is highly questionable—essentially, Leverate appears to be operating as a “clone broker,” using the details of a properly regulated entity but not itself holding valid oversight. This is not a minor technicality: trust in regulatory protections only applies when a broker is genuinely under a competent authority. Moreover, recent reports indicate Leverate has been excluded from the CySEC Investor Compensation Fund, further diminishing any institutional safety net that individual traders might expect. In my view, protections such as segregated accounts, compensation funds, and formal dispute resolution—critical aspects of true regulation—are at serious risk when these regulatory relationships are unverified or misrepresented. For me, this means I would not consider my funds adequately safeguarded if entrusted to Leverate. In short, without authentic, verifiable regulatory oversight, there simply isn’t a reliable assurance of fund security with this provider, so I would exercise utmost caution.

Speaking as an experienced forex trader, when evaluating a broker, overnight financing (swap) fees are a core consideration, as they can significantly impact long-term positions. However, with Leverate, based on my in-depth review and the available context, I simply haven’t found direct, transparent information about their swap fee structure—if any is actually applicable. This lack of detail raises concerns, especially compared to other established brokers where swap rates are clearly published and consistently updated. But the most important discovery for me is that Leverate does not operate as a traditional retail forex broker. Instead, they position themselves as a technology provider and business-to-business (B2B) liquidity provider. According to verified information, retail traders—including myself—cannot open accounts, deposit funds, or trade directly through them. Leverate’s core clients are institutions or brokers rather than individuals. Therefore, any comparison of swap fees is not directly relevant, as those fees would ultimately depend on the actual retail broker utilizing Leverate’s solutions, not Leverate itself. For this reason, I would strongly advise caution. If you are a retail trader seeking to minimize overnight costs, you’ll need to look at regulated retail brokers that openly provide swap schedules and detailed fee breakdowns. With Leverate, not only is detailed swap information absent, the firm’s operational model means retail swap rates are not their domain. This critical gap, combined with reported concerns about suspicious licensing and regulatory status, makes me extremely cautious, and I would not recommend pursuing swap-related comparisons involving Leverate for individual retail trading.

Speaking as an experienced trader who has reviewed many brokerages, my assessment of Leverate’s offering is shaped by the details available about their business structure and operational transparency. Leverate is not a typical retail forex broker; their core focus is technology solutions and liquidity provision for other brokerages rather than individual traders. This is a crucial distinction for anyone considering working with their platform. Leverate’s business model is largely business-to-business (B2B), providing instruments like FX, CFDs, and gold within sophisticated white-label solutions, but not facilitating direct retail trading. From an instruments perspective, Leverate provides access to multiple asset classes—including forex, crypto, and CFDs—through their technology packages. For institutional clients, this broad coverage is valuable because it allows brokerages to service diverse customer demands. Their connection to leading liquidity providers potentially enables stable and competitive market conditions for their clients’ end-users, but as an individual trader, this is indirect benefit at best. On fees, concrete details for retail users simply aren't available, as Leverate does not onboard individuals for trading accounts, deposits, or withdrawals. The underlying fee structures, including spreads, commissions, or funding charges, are not transparently published from a retail client standpoint. This absence of clear, direct customer-facing pricing should be approached cautiously; any cost experienced by retail traders would be defined by the partner broker using Leverate’s solutions, not by Leverate directly. Ultimately, the main advantage lies in the strength of their B2B technology solutions, not retail trading conditions. For me, as a retail trader focused on transparent cost structures and direct access, Leverate does not present a suitable option. Their offerings are more relevant to industry players looking to launch or improve brokerage services, not to individuals seeking to trade directly under Leverate’s name.