简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：WikiFX Reveals Alarming Trends: Top Online Trading Complaints in Pakistan November 2023.
The latest data from WikiFX for November 2023 reveals alarming trends in the online trading industry, with traders in Pakistan facing challenges related to fund withdrawals and other issues. In this report, we shed light on the brokers that have garnered the most complaints from Pakistani traders. These concerns primarily revolve around the inability to withdraw funds, leaving traders frustrated and concerned about their investments.
GTM (Global Transaction Market LLC)
GTM, an unregulated online trading broker, has been at the center of numerous complaints from traders worldwide. Most of these complaints relate to fraudulent activities, scams, and the inability to withdraw funds. Despite regulatory efforts in various countries, GTM continues to operate, posing risks to traders' investments.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 6
Kwakol Markets, a multi-asset brokerage firm based in Nigeria, has expanded its operations globally and earned recognition from regulatory authorities such as the Australian Securities and Investment Commission (ASIC). While this regulatory status implies compliance with international standards, a Pakistani trader recently reported a withdrawal issue with Kwakol Markets.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 8
PuPrime
PuPrime, also known as Pacific Union (Seychelles) Limited, operates as a forex broker and is headquartered in Seychelles. Although the company claims to be regulated by the Financial Services Authority of Seychelles, concerns have arisen in several jurisdictions. Regulatory authorities in France and Spain have blacklisted PuPrime due to its unregulated status, raising questions about its operations in Europe. A Pakistani trader has also reported difficulties in withdrawing funds from PuPrime.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 26
SquaredFinancial
SquaredFinancial, a dynamic online Contract for Difference (CFD) broker, offers a wide range of financial products and services. It boasts regulatory compliance with the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) and operates under European standards. However, a Pakistani trader recently reported an issue with fund withdrawals while trading with SquaredFinancial.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 4
UBS Group AG, a Swiss-based multinational investment bank and financial services company, is recognized as a global banking giant. Despite its reputation for client confidentiality, UBS has not been immune to complaints from Pakistani traders regarding difficulties in withdrawing funds.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 13
BinomoTop
BinomoTop, a cloned broker of Binomo, has been actively offering trading instruments similar to the legitimate Binomo platform. However, it lacks clear regulatory status and may pose a risk to unsuspecting traders who believe they are dealing with a regulated entity. Currently, BinomoTop has accumulated a staggering 46 complaints, reflecting the concerns of traders worldwide.
Total Accumulated Complaints: 46
To protect their investments and ensure a secure trading environment, traders are encouraged to:
Verify the regulatory status of the broker.
Review user feedback and complaints.
Read the broker's terms and conditions carefully.
Only invest what they can afford to lose.
The online trading industry continues to evolve, and traders should exercise caution when selecting a broker. Awareness of potential risks and thorough research can help traders make informed decisions and safeguard their investments.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.
Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.
When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
