GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:OctaFX denies claims of false promises after Indian authorities seized $9.6 million, emphasizing their commitment to transparent and educated Forex trading practices

In response to recent proceedings by Indian authorities, OctaFX has categorically denied any fraudulent claims of huge profits. The corporation denied the allegations and maintained that OctaFX has no formal representation in any nation or area.
The dispute erupted when the Indian Enforcement Directorate (ED) conducted searches at numerous OctaFX office sites throughout the nation. India Today claimed that these searches resulted in the recovery of INR 804.3 million (more than $9.6 million). Similar raids on the broker's offices occurred earlier this year.
The ED's activities were spread throughout many cities, including Mumbai, Kolkata, Delhi, and Gurgaon, and targeted these offices in accordance with local anti-money laundering regulations. Authorities also linked the administration of OctaFX's local activities to the company's subsidiaries in Russia, Spain, Georgia, and Dubai. According to the Hindustan Times, allegations imply that the platform employed multiple Indian people overseas to run its activities, leading authorities to begin probing.
OctaFX's issues started when numerous people in Pune filed a police complaint against the platform, accusing it of defrauding them with promises of big profits. In response, OctaFX reaffirmed its position: “We never claimed that trading with Octa would result in rapid and massive profits. On the contrary, we have constantly said that Forex trading requires an informed and deliberate attitude, which we assist in developing via training resources made accessible on our website, YouTube channel, and Octa app.”
According to Indian officials, OctaFX's Indian activities generated more than INR 10 billion (roughly $119.5 million). They claim that some of these monies were moved to offshore firms via complicated transactions, with a part routed through locally controlled funds to seem genuine.
Authorities further claimed that OctaFX used firms registered in the British Virgin Islands and Estonia to transfer monies for promotional purposes. Notably, trading contracts for difference (CFDs) are unregulated in India. Although not technically prohibited, the Indian central bank has issued several cautions against unregulated FX and CFD trading, including releasing a list of brokers that provide services without a license.
Despite the legal issues, OctaFX defended its operations, claiming, “Even though we recognize that Forex trading is restricted in India and that certain brokers do not comply with local rules, it is crucial to highlight that Octa is a worldwide and regulated broker. We use best worldwide practices to avoid harmful activity and money laundering while also protecting our clients' finances.”

In response to the Pune case and charges of fraudulent promises, OctaFX reaffirmed that these assertions are untrue, underlining their lack of formal representation in any nation or area. The firm emphasized its dedication to openness and education in forex trading. “We have consistently underlined that Forex trading requires a knowledgeable and conscious approach, which we help to develop through educational materials publicly available on our website, YouTube channel, and the Octa app,” according to the press release.
OctaFX also emphasized its tight promotional procedures, which limit guarantees or promises to internally launched campaigns. According to their Introducing Broker Agreement, partners must behave openly and advise customers about the hazards of Forex trading before creating an actual trading account.
The firm is cautious in monitoring its partners' public actions and responding immediately to any misleading or untrue claims. However, OctaFX recognized cases in which imposters utilized their brand name and emblem to fool customers. “We are continually monitoring for unauthorized usage of our brand name and doing everything we can to prevent and rectify such situations. However, we cannot be held liable for the behavior of criminals,” they added.
OctaFX finished by underlining its worldwide and regulated status, adherence to best standards, and attempts to provide safe and steady trading performance for all of its clients. “We use the best global practices to prevent malicious activities and money laundering, as well as to secure our customers' funds,” the statement said, emphasizing the company's dedication to its clients and transparent operations.
The evolving issue emphasizes the intricacies and obstacles that global Forex brokers confront when operating in locations with strict rules, as well as the need to maintain transparency and rigorous compliance mechanisms.
Learn more about OctaFX's response to recent allegations and their commitment to transparency. Visit the OctaFX page on WikiFX for detailed information.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.

Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.

When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact