WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Six trading platforms have been flagged for operating in the UK without authorization. Despite polished websites and claimed UK addresses, none are licensed—posing serious risks to investors.

A group of online investment platforms has recently come under scrutiny for operating without authorization in the UK. These firms present themselves as legitimate trading services, often through professional websites and detailed contact pages. However, none of them are registered with the UKs Financial Conduct Authority (FCA) or any recognized regulator, making them high-risk for investors.
Below is a summary of the six exposed platforms, based on currently available details:
Website: www.bitmaxltd.com
Email: support@bitmaxltd.com
Bitmax Limited promotes itself as a trading firm offering investment services across digital assets and forex. Despite its polished website and claims of global reach, the company is not listed in any UK regulatory registry. There is no transparency about its ownership or operational jurisdiction, which raises red flags regarding accountability and investor protection.
Website: peaktradepro.pro
Email: support@peaktradepro.pro
Claimed addresses:
This platform uses a dual-location strategy, displaying both US and UK addresses in an apparent attempt to build credibility. However, it is not licensed in either jurisdiction. The mismatch between its professional presentation and regulatory status suggests the platform may be misrepresenting its legitimacy to attract unsuspecting users.
Website: optitraderia.pro
OptiTrader AI promotes algorithm-based trading solutions and AI-driven investment strategies. The website appears well-branded, yet provides no verifiable information about the companys legal structure, leadership, or licensing. The lack of regulatory oversight combined with opaque claims of technological sophistication makes this platform particularly risky.
Websites:
Miradex Trader operates on multiple domains, which is often a tactic used by questionable operators to bypass blacklists or redirect traffic. The platform provides minimal company background and no verified registration. Despite offering access to various financial instruments, it is not authorized to provide services to UK investors.
Website: tradeprolexipro.net
Claimed location: United Kingdom (no specific address provided)
Trade Pro Lexipro markets itself as a UK-based trading firm but offers no licensing details or public records to verify its standing. The website lacks transparency regarding corporate ownership and regulatory approval, a common trait among fraudulent platforms.
Websites:
This entity uses two nearly identical websites to advertise an “advanced trading suite” with vague references to professional support and integrated tools. However, it offers no information about its parent company, team, or compliance status. The duplication of branding across domains without regulatory clarity strongly suggests an effort to avoid detection.
All six of these platforms share a dangerous commonality: they are not authorized to provide financial services in the UK, nor do they offer any form of investor protection. Engaging with such entities leaves users fully exposed in the event of disputes, losses, or withdrawal issues. In most cases, there is no clear path for recovery once funds are transferred.
To protect yourself, always verify a platforms license through reliable sources. The WikiFX database provides broker license checks, regulatory warnings, and user reviews across jurisdictions. In a time when fraudulent platforms often appear professional and convincing, due diligence is your first line of defense.
Even if a platform looks credible, never rely solely on its marketing claims. If it is not licensed, it is not safe.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.