简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract：CONSOB orders the blocking of five unauthorized investment websites in Italy as part of its ongoing effort to curb financial fraud and protect investors.
Italys financial regulator, the Companies and Exchange Commission (CONSOB), has issued new blocking orders against five unauthorized investment websites operating illegally within the country. The move strengthens Italys ongoing crackdown on unlicensed trading platforms and fraudulent financial services.
According to CONSOB, four of the websites offered illegal investment and trading services, while one promoted a fake trading platform that misused the image of Italian officials and energy companies, including that of President Sergio Mattarella.
The newly blocked domains include:
With the latest enforcement actions, CONSOB has now blocked 1,522 websites since receiving such powers in July 2019 under the ‘Growth Decree’ and the ‘Capital Law’. These legal frameworks enable the regulator to take direct action against abusive financial intermediaries operating without authorization.
Internet service providers (ISPs) in Italy have begun implementing the blocks. However, CONSOB noted that it may take a few days for the restrictions to become fully effective due to technical deployment timelines.
The authority continues to urge investors to verify the authorization status of all online trading and investment platforms before engaging in any financial transactions. These steps, according to CONSOB, are part of Italys broader effort to ensure financial market integrity and protect retail investors from high-risk or fraudulent schemes.
The Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa (CONSOB) is Italy‘s independent public authority responsible for regulating and overseeing the country’s financial markets. It supervises investment firms, securities markets, and listed companies to promote transparency, investor protection, and fair market practices.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
A close look at ZarVista's regulatory status shows major red flags that mark it as a high-risk broker for traders. This analysis goes beyond the company's marketing materials to examine the real substance of its licenses, business structure, and operating history. The main issues we will explore include its dependence on weak offshore regulation, a large number of serious user complaints, and worrying details about its corporate identity. It is also important to note that ZarVista previously operated under the name Zara FX, a detail that provides important background to its history. This article aims to deliver a complete, evidence-based breakdown of the ZarVista license framework and its real-world effects, helping traders understand the serious risks involved before investing.
Warning: Multibank Group faces multiple allegations of scams in Vietnam, the UAE, and Italy. Reports include blocked withdrawals, confiscated profits, and fraudulent practices. Stay vigilant and protect your funds.
When traders think about choosing a new broker, two main questions come up: Is ZarVista safe or a scam? And what are the common ZarVista complaints? These questions get to the heart of what matters most—keeping your capital safe. This article gives you a detailed look at ZarVista's reputation using public information, government records, and real experiences from people who used their services. Our research starts with an important fact that shapes this whole review. WikiFX, a website that checks brokers independently, gives ZarVista a trust score of only 2.07 out of 10. This very low rating comes with a clear warning: "Low score, please stay away!" The main reason for this low score is the large number of user complaints. This finding shows that ZarVista might be risky to use. To get the complete picture, we will look at the broker's government approval status, examine the specific complaints from users, check any positive reviews to be fair, and give you a final answer based on fact
WikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFXWikiFX
