WikiFX

Reply

As a trader who places a strong emphasis on transparency and regulatory oversight, I approached TKFutures Inc with a considerable degree of caution. When trying to break down the total trading costs for indices like the US100, I immediately encountered a significant obstacle: there is almost no readily accessible information regarding spreads, commissions, platform fees, or even minimum deposit requirements on their public channels. This lack of disclosure is not typical in my experience with more transparent, regulated brokers and raises a red flag for me, especially because accurate cost calculation is central to any trading strategy. Furthermore, TKFutures Inc is currently unregulated, with WikiFX highlighting not only an absence of valid regulatory information but also a suspicious regulatory license and a suspicious scope of business. From my perspective, unregulated status means there is no independent verification of their business practices or any assurance that costs disclosed—or undisclosed—are fair or competitive compared to industry standards. This makes it nearly impossible for me to accurately estimate the total cost structure for trading indices like the US100 without risking unexpected or hidden fees. Given these factors, I simply can't responsibly quantify the trading costs at TKFutures Inc. For me, the lack of fee transparency, combined with regulatory absence, introduces a level of risk and uncertainty I cannot justify. I would urge fellow traders to exercise extreme caution and prioritize platforms that provide full fee details upfront and operate under recognized regulatory frameworks.