점수
RHB
https://www.rhbinvest.com.hk/Home.aspx?lang=en
공식 사이트
평점 지수
연락처
라이선스 기관:RHB Futures Hong Kong Limited
라이선스 번호:AMF103
- 이 브로커는 현재 효력 있는 규제가 없는 것으로 확인되었습니다. 위험에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
RHB 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
AVATRADE
Vantage
IC Markets Global
HANTEC MARKETS
웹사이트 감정
rhbinvest.com.hk
96.45.82.63서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜--웹사이트 이름--회사--
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| RHB Review Summary | |
| 설립 | 1983 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 말레이시아 |
| 규제 | SFC (Revoked) |
| 거래 상품 | 미래 지수, 상품 |
| 서비스 | 주식 마진 금융, 외국 주식 금융, 임의 금융, 직원 주식 옵션 계획 (ESOS) 금융, 초기 공개 상장 (IPO) 금융 |
| 거래 플랫폼 | RHB 주식 거래 |
| 고객 지원 | 전화: 03-2113 8118; +603 – 7890 4700 |
| 팩스: +603 – 7890 4670 | |
| 이메일: support@rhbgroup.com | |
| 등록 주소: Level 10, Tower One, RHB Centre, Jalan Tun Razak, 50400 Kuala Lumpur, Wilayah Persekutuan, Malaysia | |
| 지점 연락처: https://www.rhbinvest.com/locate_us.html | |
RHB 정보
RHB 투자은행 베라드는 말레이시아에 본사를 둔 금융 기관으로 전국에 50개 이상의 지점을 보유하고 있습니다. 지수와 상품을 중심으로 선물 거래를 제공하며, 고객에게 금융 서비스도 제공합니다. 이슬람 브로킹 서비스도 이용할 수 있어 샤리아 법규를 준수해야 하는 사람들에게도 도움이 됩니다. 또한, 회사는 트레이더들이 성공적인 거래를 위해 필요한 지식을 갖추기 위한 다양한 주제의 비디오 갤러리도 제공합니다.
그러나 주목할 점은 회사가 SFC의 규제 상태가 취소되었다는 것을 의미하는 SFC 취소 상태 하에서 운영된다는 것입니다. 이는 규제 기관의 규칙을 위반하거나 규제 요건을 충족하지 못했을 가능성을 시사합니다. 이는 회사의 신뢰성과 합법성에 의문을 제기합니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| 다년간의 산업 경험 | 취소된 SFC 라이선스 |
| 다양한 금융 서비스 | |
| 포괄적인 고객 지원 |
Is RHB Legit?
RHB은 홍콩 증권선물위원회 (SFC)에 AMF103 라이선스 번호로 규제 받고 있다고 주장합니다. 그러나 라이선스 상태는 "취소"이며, 이는 해당 브로커가 기관의 규칙을 위반하거나 규제 요건을 충족하지 못했을 수 있다는 것을 의미합니다. 이는 그 신뢰성과 합법성에 의문을 제기합니다.
| 규제 국가 | 규제 기관 | 현재 상태 | 규제 업체 | 라이선스 유형 | 라이선스 번호 |
![]() | SFC | 취소 | RHB Futures Hong Kong Limited | 선물 계약 거래 | AMF103 |

거래 상품
RHB의 제품 포트폴리오에는 크루드 팜 오일 선물과 골드 선물과 같은 Bursa Malaysia 파생상품뿐만 아니라 E-Mini S&P 500, FTSE China A-50 지수 및 E-Mini 원유 선물과 같은 다양한 외국 선물 계약도 포함되어 있습니다.

수수료/이자율
| 서비스 | 시설료 | 이자율 |
| 주식 마진 금융 | ❌ | 패키지별; 롤오버 수수료 없음 |
| 외국 주식 금융 | 시설 한도의 0.50% 이상 (선납) | SBR (3.00%) + 2.30%, 최소 4.55% 연간 |
| 자유 재량 금융 | 맞춤형 | 포트폴리오 및 전략에 기반한 맞춤형 |
거래 플랫폼
RHB은(는) 웹 기반 거래 플랫폼인 “RHB Share Trading”을(를) 제공하며, iOS 및 Android 폰에서도 어디서든 거래할 수 있도록 앱 버전을 제공합니다.

키워드
- 5-10년
- 의문 있는 규제 라이선스
- 업무 구역 의심
- 홍콩Dealing in futures contracts 취소됨
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
What is the highest leverage RHB provides for major forex pairs, and how does their leverage policy vary for different asset classes?
After examining RHB’s profile and disclosures, I find there’s limited transparency on specific leverage figures for major forex pairs, which is already a concern for me as a cautious trader. RHB’s primary focus appears to be futures and derivatives—especially indices and commodities, primarily through Bursa Malaysia and certain foreign contracts like the E-mini S&P 500. Unlike many mainstream forex brokers, I didn’t see detailed or easily accessible information about margin requirements or maximum leverage for forex pairs during my research. This lack of clarity makes it difficult for me to evaluate the risk parameters, which is something I prioritize before opening an account. In my experience, responsible brokers clearly publish leverage tiers for each asset class, such as lower leverage for volatile commodities and possibly higher (but still capped) ratios for major forex pairs. Without explicit data, I cannot assume RHB offers competitive leverage or that they cater to margin traders in the way dedicated forex brokers do. Compounding my caution, RHB’s revoked SFC license in Hong Kong signals unresolved regulatory issues. For me, trading with a broker whose licensing has been revoked dramatically increases my risk, especially regarding client fund safety and dispute resolution. Overall, without detailed leverage disclosures and given RHB’s regulatory challenges, I would tread very carefully and seek out more transparent and regulated alternatives if I wanted clear leverage policies across different markets.
What major risks or drawbacks should I keep in mind if I decide to use RHB?
From my experience navigating the forex industry, the most pressing issue with RHB is its revoked SFC license, which signals a significant regulatory risk. For me, a regulatory status like “revoked” is a red flag, because it means the broker either failed to comply with authorities or potentially violated important rules. This lack of oversight leaves traders like myself with little recourse should problems arise. Even though RHB has several years of industry presence and offers a range of products and financing services, the absence of active regulation undermines my trust in their operations. In markets where funds security and transparency are paramount, trading with a broker that has lost its license poses real dangers—primarily the risk that client protections may be weaker or nonexistent. Another drawback I see is the ambiguity around the scope of business and licensing, which WikiFX calls “suspicious.” When regulatory boundaries are unclear, it makes it harder for traders to verify legitimacy or take action if a dispute occurs. Personally, I firmly believe that regulatory clarity isn’t just bureaucratic—it’s a foundation for accountability and fair dealing. For anyone considering RHB, my advice is to proceed with great caution. The potential benefits of diverse products or customer support don’t offset the foundational risk of choosing a broker with such regulatory concerns. For me, robust and active regulation is non-negotiable. In the end, safeguarding capital should always come first.
Have you experienced any drawbacks with RHB's customer service or the reliability of their platform?
As someone who has spent considerable time evaluating various brokers, RHB’s offering presents immediate concerns for me, particularly regarding reliability and customer safety. One of my main reservations stems from the broker’s revoked regulatory license with the Hong Kong SFC, which signals a lapse in compliance or failure to meet the authority’s requirements. This lack of valid oversight always makes me think twice, no matter how long a broker has been in business or how extensive their customer service claims are. From my firsthand experience, brokers operating without current, credible regulation tend to be more susceptible to operational issues, including inconsistent platform performance and delays in customer support responses. Although RHB promotes a web-based trading platform and app support, the absence of transparent, up-to-date regulatory backing gives me little confidence about the platform’s long-term reliability or how customer disputes would be handled. Moreover, while RHB advertises comprehensive customer support via phone and email, my cautious approach means I look for clear and enforced mechanisms of accountability—something that revoked regulatory status doesn’t provide. In my opinion, even if the customer service appears robust on the surface, the underlying risk of dealing with a broker of ambiguous regulatory standing is simply too high for comfort, especially when handling funds or requesting technical support in urgent situations.
Considering both user reviews and your own assessment, how would you evaluate the credibility of RHB?
Having spent over a decade navigating various forex and futures brokers, I always make regulatory status my top criterion for credibility—especially given the risks of unregulated environments. My review of RHB left me with serious reservations. Despite the broker’s established history and its extensive financial offerings, including futures on global indices and commodities, I find their regulatory standing highly concerning. RHB’s claim of regulation by the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong is undermined by the fact that their license is currently revoked. For me, this is a clear warning signal. A revoked license generally means the broker has failed to meet or has violated regulatory requirements, and that eliminates the layer of oversight designed to protect traders like myself. While RHB provides a wide range of trading services and useful platforms, the lack of active regulation makes it difficult for me to trust them with significant capital. In my experience, even well-established companies are not immune to operational risk when oversight lapses. I also take into account the broker’s low risk management scores as indicators that caution is necessary. For anyone considering RHB, I cannot recommend involvement without restored and transparent regulatory compliance. With safer, well-regulated alternatives readily available, I personally would not compromise when real funds are involved.
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....

