Bybit to Restrict Services in Japan Amid Regulatory Pressure
Crypto exchange Bybit will limit access for Japanese users in 2025, citing compliance with strict local regulations.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:At least five cryptocurrency exchanges told their customers today that the Solana network has stopped all deposits and withdrawals of Tether's USDT and Circle's USDC.

As the FTX problem continues to shake up the cryptocurrency world, big platforms like Binance, OKX, BitMex, and ByBit have said that the halt will start right away. The two stablecoins exist on many other blockchain networks, but users who want to trade either of them on Solana are not allowed to. Binance's email went on to clarify that deposits in other ecosystems, like Ethereum and Cronos, would be unaffected.
In response, Circle, the company that gives out USDC, told users that their stablecoin based on Solana is working fine and that sending or receiving the stablecoin is not a problem. “USDC may always be redeemed for US dollars.” “Any sum.” “Any time.” “Free of charge.” “Always,” the company stated.

Tether, the world's largest stablecoin issuer, has distanced itself from the liquidity problem that plagued FTX and Alameda Research, claiming it had no links to Samuel Bankman-Crypto Fried's empire. Tether's CTO, Paolo Ardoino, wrote a thread to soothe market participants' anxieties and uncertainties about the link between FTX and its USDT cryptocurrency.
He also stated that, despite having previously issued and redeemed a significant amount of USDT, Alameda has no credit exposure with the faltering cryptocurrency trading firm.
Although these exchanges did not explain why they opted to stop Solana transactions, the decision comes during one of the most volatile weeks in cryptocurrency history. The story reached its climax when Sam Bankman-crypto Fried's empire filed for bankruptcy, citing a lack of cash flow and a “run on the bank”-like situation as the reason.
Aside from FTX's problems, the insolvent exchange and its creator have strong links to the Solana ecosystem. Alameda Research, Bankman Crypto Fried's trading department, funded $314 million for Solana's development team.
Due to the collapse of FTX's native token, the price of SOL has lost about two-thirds of its market value as investors continue to leave. At this point, the recent suspensions might be seen as a precautionary measure to protect FTX from overexposure to Solana's network while waiting for the situation to at least normalize.
Solana is an open-source blockchain designed to compete with Ethereum. It supports smart contracts, including non-fungible tokens (NFTs), as well as a wide range of decentralized apps (dApps).
Alameda Research and FTX have a lot of control over the SOL token, which can be staked to help protect the network and be used to send value.
Bitcoin, on the other hand, is still worth more than $16,600 as of Friday afternoon, almost the same as it was on Monday but 5% less than a week earlier. Before the collapse of prominent cryptocurrency exchange FTX two weekends ago, the world's biggest cryptocurrency traded at $21,000. The two-week crash sent Bitcoin to two-year lows. In the last week, it has ranged between $16,200 and $17,000.
After topping at $1,277 for the week on Tuesday, Ethereum is now trading a little over $1,200. Before the FTX drop, the #2 cryptocurrency was trading at $1,650.
FTX is one of the major cryptocurrency exchanges in the world. It lets people trade digital currencies for other digital currencies or regular money, and the other way around. Mr. Bankman-Fried was in charge of it, and it was situated in the Bahamas. It has spent millions of dollars pushing US lawmakers to pass crypto-friendly legislation.

Check out more of FTX here: https://www.wikifx.com/en/dealer/1257143466.html
Stay tuned for more FTX news.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Crypto exchange Bybit will limit access for Japanese users in 2025, citing compliance with strict local regulations.

In a competitive online trading space, few companies can claim a history as long as AMarkets. Started in 2007, this broker has helped over three million clients and built a strong presence, especially in CIS, Asian, and Latin American markets. What makes it appealing is clear right away: very high leverage, many different account types, and an excellent 4.8-star rating on Trustpilot based on reviews from over 3,000 users so far. These features show a popular and seemingly trustworthy trading partner. However, a closer look shows a basic problem that traders may face. Behind the attractive features and positive user opinions lies a major concern: AMarkets works only under offshore regulation. It doesn't have licenses from any top-level regulatory bodies like the FCA (UK), ASIC (Australia), or CySEC (Cyprus). This AMarkets Review 2025 aims to break down this contradiction. We will provide a complete analysis based on verified facts, looking at the broker's safety measures, trading condi

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.

When choosing a broker, the most important question is always: "Are my funds safe?" The answer depends on the broker's regulatory framework. For a company like AMarkets, which has been operating since 2007, understanding its licensing isn't just about checking a box. It's about understanding what that regulation truly means for your protection as a trader. This article provides a clear, detailed breakdown of AMarkets' licenses, what their offshore status really means, the extra safety measures it uses, and the risks you need to consider. We will go beyond marketing claims to give you factual, balanced information about their official licenses and other trust signals, helping you make a smart decision.