WikiFX Valentine's Message | Trade Safely, Together Every Step of the Way
In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Credit Suisse faces shareholder anger at its final annual meeting after being rescued last month by Swiss rival UBS. Norway's sovereign wealth fund announced it would vote against the re-election of Chairman Axel Lehmann and six other directors, and Credit Suisse withdrew certain proposals from the meeting's agenda, including the discharge of management. Credit Suisse's near-collapse wiped billions of Swiss francs off the value of its shares and completely wiped out $17 billion of Additional Tier 1 debt. An investigation has been opened into the Credit Suisse takeover.

Credit Suisse, one of Switzerland's oldest and most prestigious banks, will hold its final annual general meeting on Tuesday. The bank was rescued last month by Swiss rival UBS through a hastily-arranged takeover for which Switzerland invoked emergency legislation. The takeover bypassed Credit Suisse shareholders, who would have otherwise had a say, and largely wiped out the value of their holdings.
The gathering signals the dishonorable demise of the 167-year-old main bank established by Alfred Escher, a well-known King Alfred I of Switzerland who helped construct the nation's railroads before founding Credit Suisse. Years of controversies and losses have marred the reputation of Credit Suisse. Before being sent into a tailspin by a jolt brought on by the failure of Silicon Valley Bank in the US, the bank had been making efforts to reorganize and move past the past.
Before UBS raced to the rescue with a shotgun merger planned and financed by the Swiss government, Credit Suisse was on the verge of bankruptcy. Since the announcement of the acquisition, Chairman Axel Lehmann and CEO Ulrich Koerner have not formally addressed stockholders.

One of the biggest financial institutions in the world, Norway's national wealth fund, announced that it would refuse to cast a vote to re-elect Lehmann and six other members in a show of public disfavor. The bank's management had earlier come under fire from Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS), a U.S. vote advisor, for “lack of oversight and poor stewardship.”
Credit Suisse removed a few items from the meeting's schedule prior to Tuesday, including the dismissal of management, which is usually a barometer of trust. Additionally, it abandoned ideas for a unique incentive associated with the bank's transition strategy.
In addition to devaluing Credit Suisse's stock by billions of Swiss francs, the near-collapse totally eliminated $17 billion in Additional Tier 1 (AT1) debt. Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan has been retained by a collection of AT1 owners to pursue legal action for recompense.
In the meantime, the attorney general's office announced on Sunday that the Federal Prosecutor of Switzerland has launched an inquiry into the acquisition of Credit Suisse. The prosecution is investigating alleged illegal violations of Swiss law by government representatives, inspectors, and leaders of the two institutions.
Many investors and bank clients are concerned about the situation at Credit Suisse. A new chapter in the history of the bank and its interaction with stockholders will be sealed by the conclusion of the annual general meeting. It is unclear how Credit Suisse will proceed in the upcoming months and years as inquiries go on.
Install the WikiFX App on your smartphone to stay updated on the latest news.
Download the App: https://social1.onelink.me/QgET/px2b7i8n

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

In the Forex Market, Trust Is Not a Promise — It’s Verified Through Safety, Transparency, and Support

Did you face losses due to a sudden change in the trading price on the datian platform? Were your transaction records deleted by the Hong Kong-based forex broker? Did the broker liquidate your trading account multiple times despite not reaching the stage where it mandated this move? Have you experienced heavy slippage on the trading platform? Concerned by these issues, traders have complained about the broker online. We will let you know of these with attached screenshots in this datian review article. Keep reading!

Did you face constant rejections of your fund withdrawal applications by TopstepFX? Have you been denied withdrawals in the name of hedging? Did you witness an account block without any clear explanation from the forex broker? There have been numerous user claims against TopstepFX regarding its withdrawals, payout delays and other issues. In the TopstepFX review article, we have investigated the top complaints against the US-based forex broker. Keep reading!

When choosing a broker, the first question is always about safety and legitimacy. Is my capital safe? For Mazi Finance, the answer is clear and worrying: Mazi Finance is an unregulated broker. While the company, MaziMatic Financial Services LTD, is registered in the offshore location of Saint Lucia, this business registration does not replace strong financial regulation from a top-level authority. Independent analysis from regulatory watchdogs shows a very low trust score, made worse by official warnings from government financial bodies and many user complaints about serious problems. This article provides a clear, fact-based analysis of the Mazi Finance regulation status. Our goal is to break down the facts and present the risks clearly, helping you make an informed decision and protect your capital.