GmtFX Flagged for Operating Without Authorisation as Regulatory and Risk Signals Mount
GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:Philippine legislator Senator Robin Padilla files Senate Bill 2889 to protect endorsers from legal liabilities in investment scams, including crypto and forex frauds.


Robin Padilla, a Philippine actor-turned-senator, has introduced Senate Bill 2889, a new legislative provision aimed at safeguarding endorsers from undue accountability in investment schemes. This measure is in reaction to growing worries about the role endorsers play in promoting fraudulent schemes, notably in crypto and FX trading.
The law was presented in response to recent scandals regarding Dermacare, which the government has accused of soliciting unapproved investments and marketing unregistered securities. The arrest of actress Nerizza “Neri” Naig-Miranda and the arrest warrant for comedian Rufa Mae Quinto, both tied to Dermacare, emphasized the vulnerability of endorsers, who frequently suffer legal penalties for just lending their names to these companies.
Padilla's bill comes at a time when the role of endorsers is under scrutiny, particularly in terms of their legal responsibilities in promoting business enterprises that later face claims of investment fraud. “Recent events reveal a growing concern for the welfare of endorsers whose names are dragged into various investment scams,” Padilla stated in support of the bill. He emphasizes that endorsers are sometimes the first to face legal charges simply because their images and names appear in advertising efforts, even when they are not participating in unlawful activity.

The proposed legislation proposes to change the structure of endorsement agreements to safeguard endorsers. Padilla suggests that all endorsement contracts contain required sections that clearly describe the endorser's obligations and specify expressly that they are not involved in the marketing of investment contracts or securities. This is done to ensure that endorsers are not held responsible for supporting fraudulent schemes they were ignorant of.
Businesses must offer complete disclosure of the nature of their activities, including whether they sell investment contracts or securities, under Senate Bill 2889. Endorsers will also be required to sign agreements stating that they will not promote or sell such securities unless they are licensed brokers.
Furthermore, the measure underlines that organizations participating in the selling of securities must guarantee that investments are not made through endorsers who are not licensed brokers. It goes on to say that any endorser who falsely represents themselves as agents of an investing business will face legal action. Penalties for breaching the law include increasing fines: P100,000 for the first violation, P300,000 for the second, and P500,000 to P1 million for the third, as well as the revocation of the company's certificate of registration.
Padilla emphasized that many endorsers are uninformed of the legal complexities of the Securities Regulation Code and frequently become embroiled in legal troubles as a result of a lack of public understanding on the subject. The law aims to close this gap and avoid exploitation by defining endorsers' duties in commercial transactions, particularly those involving securities.
Senator Robin Padilla's legislation is an important step in protecting endorsers from becoming unwittingly implicated in investment schemes. SB 2889 intends to protect both endorsers and customers by creating clearer norms and stricter criteria in endorsement contracts, as well as guaranteeing more openness in commercial transactions. This law has the potential to create a precedent for more responsible endorsement methods in the future.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

GmtFX has been flagged by Swiss regulators for operating without authorisation. WikiFX data shows no license, low safety scores, and elevated investor risk.

The Indian Finance Minister Nirmala Sitharaman, while announcing the Union Budget 2026-27, proposed a sharp rise in the Securities Transaction Tax (STT) on Futures and Options as part of the government’s strategy to soothe the country’s overheated derivatives market. The move comes on the backdrop of regulators’ concerns over excessive speculation in F&O allowing retail traders to enter the market and lose capital. Whether the government will be able to curb excessive speculation in F&O through this move remains to be seen. The stock indices, however, were hit hard, with the BSE Sensex falling by 1500 points amid widespread selling on the STT hike. Let’s examine the potential impact of this hike on Indian F&O traders.

Long Asia Group, a Saint Vincent and the Grenadines-based forex broker, has come under increasing scrutiny as a growing number of traders report troubling experiences with the broker’s operations. User feedback highlights recurring issues such as delayed or blocked withdrawals, sudden communication breakdowns, and a lack of clear accountability once funds are deposited. Several traders claim that while small withdrawals may initially go through, larger payout requests often face unexplained obstacles. More concerning are allegations suggesting that the broker may no longer be operating transparently, with users reporting prolonged silence, unresolved complaints and suspected fund mishandling. These patterns have raised serious questions about Long Asia Group’s reliability and overall legitimacy, prompting traders to exercise extreme caution before engaging with the broker. For more details, keep reading this LONG ASIA review article, where we have elaborated on the traders’ pain wit

Has your MY MAA MARKETS forex trading experience been nothing short of a financial misery? Do you fail to gain the forex broker’s approval for fund withdrawals? Were you denied withdrawals on the grounds of fake accusations concerning system abuse and hedging? Does the broker deliberately cause you unwarranted slippage as you start executing winning trades? Do you feel the broker is unregulated? Your concerns seem genuine, as many traders have accused the broker of serious financial misconduct. In this MY MAA MARKETS review article, we have investigated some trader complaints. Take a look!