WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:11 new websites have been blocked by Consob for providing unlicensed financial or crypto services. WikiFX reminds investors to avoid unlicensed platforms and do proper background checks.

Italys financial markets regulator Consob has announced the latest round of enforcement measures aimed at protecting retail investors from unauthorized financial activity. On 22 May 2025, the authority ordered the blackout of 11 websites found to be offering financial or crypto-related services to Italian users without proper authorization.
The move includes seven websites involved in abusive financial intermediation, and four sites providing crypto services illegally. These actions are part of Consobs broader effort to limit public access to high-risk, unregulated platforms.
The blackout orders were issued under powers granted by the Growth Decree (converted into law no. 58 of 28 June 2019), which allows Consob to restrict online access to fraudulent or unauthorized financial intermediaries. For crypto-related services, the regulator also acted under new legal authority stemming from the MiCAR framework (EU Regulation 2023/1114) and Italys Legislative Decree No. 129 of 5 September 2024.
These combined regulatory tools enable Italian authorities to act decisively against online platforms operating without registration or transparency, especially when targeting domestic savers.
The following domains have been flagged and will be subject to blackouts by Italian Internet service providers:
With this latest round of action, the total number of websites blacked out by Consob since July 2019 has now reached 1,328.
This latest enforcement action highlights the ongoing risks of engaging with unlicensed platforms—especially those operating online with little transparency. Investors are strongly encouraged to verify a brokers regulatory status, license details, and operational background before depositing any funds.
To help with this, users can turn to WikiFX, a global broker verification platform, to check for regulatory licenses, user complaints, and risk warnings. If a broker is not listed or lacks proper authorization, it may be best to stay away.
Always do your due diligence—if something seems too good to be true, it probably is.
Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.