WikiFX Deep Dive Review: ExpertOption
Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.
简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Abstract:A 40-year-old engineer from Malaysia lost RM71,000 after falling for a fake investment scheme advertised on Facebook.

A 40-year-old engineer from Malaysia lost RM71,000 after falling for a fake investment scheme advertised on Facebook.
According to Kemaman police, the incident began on 8 April when the man saw an advertisement on Facebook promoting a share investment opportunity. Interested, he reached out to a woman listed in the ad to learn more.
The woman claimed to represent a Chinese investment company and introduced the man to a mobile application that was supposedly used to manage the investment. Convinced by her claims and the app's appearance, the engineer made an initial small deposit. Soon after, he received a return of RM600. Encouraged by the early payout, he believed the scheme was legitimate.
Over the following month, between 27 May and 26 June, he transferred RM71,000 in total, hoping to earn larger profits. However, the situation took a turn when the expected returns never arrived, and the woman who had introduced the scheme became unreachable. It was at this point that he realised he had been scammed.
Kemaman police chief Superintendent Mohd Razi Rosli confirmed the case and urged the public to be cautious when dealing with investment offers online. He emphasised the importance of ensuring that any company or individual promoting investments is registered with and supervised by the Securities Commission Malaysia. He also advised the public to contact the National Scam Response Centre (NSRC) at 997 to verify any suspicious offers before transferring funds to third-party accounts.
This case is one of many that reflect a worrying rise in scams using social media platforms and mobile apps to lure victims. Scammers often create convincing tools and offer small initial gains to build trust before persuading individuals to invest more.
To help people avoid such traps, tools like WikiFX are becoming increasingly valuable. WikiFX provides detailed information about brokers and financial platforms, including licensing status, regulatory oversight, and user reviews. The platform also issues warnings about unlicensed or suspicious entities, helping users identify red flags early.

By checking a brokers background through WikiFX, investors can make more informed decisions and avoid being drawn into fraudulent schemes. As online scams become more advanced and harder to detect, having access to reliable, independent verification tools is essential for anyone considering a financial investment.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.

Reference to WikiFX records shows that **ExpertOption is a high-risk broker.** While the company has been operating since 2017 and has a popular trading app, the safety foundations are weak.

If you are looking into ICM Capital (also known simply as ICM), you might be attracted by their established history since 2017 or their access to the MetaTrader platforms. However, glancing at the surface isn't enough when your capital is at risk. With a concerning WikiFX Score of 2.46 out of 10, this broker is currently flashing warning signals that every potential client needs to understand before hitting the "Deposit" button.

In the world of online trading, trust is the currency that matters most. However, recent data aggregation by WikiFX has signaled a "level red" alert regarding Tradeview Markets. Between July and November 2025, our support center was flooded with complaints alleging that the broker unilaterally wiped out account balances under the guise of "negative balance reversal," while simultaneously employing "account deletion" tactics in Asian markets. This report investigates the alarming patterns behind these complaints and analyzes why existing regulations failed to protect these traders.

For traders asking, "Is ZarVista legit?", the evidence points to a clear and strong conclusion: ZarVista operates as a high-risk broker. While it shows a modern interface and different account types, these features are overshadowed by major weaknesses in how it is regulated, a history of legal problems, and many user complaints. This article will break down these issues to give you a complete view of the risks involved. Our analysis shows that the chance of losing capital when dealing with ZarVista is very high. The combination of weak overseas licensing and documented problems creates a situation where trader funds are not properly protected.