简体中文
繁體中文
English
Pусский
日本語
ภาษาไทย
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Indonesia
Español
हिन्दी
Filippiiniläinen
Français
Deutsch
Português
Türkçe
한국어
العربية
Scam Warning: Be Aware of Those Brokers That May Endanger Your Funds
Abstract:Regulatory compliance, transparency, and trustworthiness should always come first when we choose a forex broker. Unfortunately, many traders fall victim to unregulated brokers or poorly monitored platforms that put their funds at risk. In this article, we’ll highlight several brokers with low WikiFX scores and serious complaints from traders worldwide. If you’re looking for a safe trading environment, you should be extremely cautious with the following names.

When choosing a forex broker, regulatory compliance, transparency, and trustworthiness should always come first. Unfortunately, many traders fall victim to unregulated brokers or poorly monitored platforms that put their funds at risk. In this article, we‘ll highlight several brokers with low WikiFX scores and serious complaints from traders worldwide. If you’re looking for a safe trading environment, you should be extremely cautious with the following names.
Brokers That May Endanger Your Funds
DeltaStock – WikiFX Score: 2.22/10
- Founded: 1998
- Headquarters: Bulgaria
- Regulation: Financial Supervision Commission (FSC), status “Exceeded”
DeltaStock has been around for over two decades, but that doesn‘t necessarily make it safe. WikiFX’s on-field investigation found no physical office in Bulgaria, raising a major red flag about its legitimacy. Furthermore, reports on social media suggest that this broker may be freezing investors funds. Traders should think twice before depositing money here.



MTrading – WikiFX Score: 2.39/10
- Founded: 2012
- Headquarters: Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
- Regulation: Claims FCA (UK) via MONETRIX LTD (License No. 16198039)
While MTrading promotes its FCA-linked license, its offshore base in SVG is concerning. WikiFX has received multiple complaints from traders in Southeast Asia and Africa, alleging unfair practices. The combination of offshore registration and a history of complaints makes this broker a high-risk choice for traders.


HTFX – WikiFX Score: 2.45/10
- Founded: 2018
- Headquarters: Vanuatu
- Regulation: FCA, CySEC, VFSC (offshore)
HTFX offers a wide range of account types and instruments, but the broker has been hit with over 170 complaints recently. Many victims allege that HTFX engages in fraudulentactivities, preventing withdrawals and manipulating trades. The large number of complaints strongly suggests this broker should be approached with extreme caution.


MultiBank Group – WikiFX Score: 2.59/10
- Founded: 2005
- Headquarters: USA (California), with offices across Asia-Pacific
- Products: Forex, metals, shares, indices, commodities, crypto
MultiBank Group markets itself as a global trading giant, but WikiFX has published multiple investigative reports raising concerns about its legitimacy. Traders have filed numerous complaints regarding withdrawal issues and potential scams. For more details, see our coverage on forex scams.
Despite its international presence, the risk factor remains high.


Headway – WikiFX Score: 4.31/10
- Trading Platforms: MT4, MT5
- Instruments: Forex, stocks, indices, energies, metals, crypto
At first glance, Headway looks like a user-friendly broker. However, it operates without regulatory oversight. More than 90 complaints have been received by WikiFX, primarily about withdrawal failures and poor customer service. Without proper licensing, traders have little to no protection if problems occur.


Comparison Table of Risky Brokers
| Broker | WikiFX Score | Year Founded | Headquarters | Regulation Status | Complaints / Issues |
| DeltaStock | 2.22/10 | 1998 | Bulgaria | FSC(status “Exceeded”) | No office found, funds frozen reports |
| MTrading | 2.39/10 | 2012 | SVG | Claims FCA via MONETRIX LTD | Complaints in SEA & Africa |
| HTFX | 2.45/10 | 2018 | Vanuatu | FCA, CySEC, VFSC (offshore) | 170+ scam-related complaints |
| MultiBank | 2.59/10 | 2005 | USA / APAC | Unclear/multiple claims | Numerous withdrawal complaints |
| Headway | 4.31/10 | 2022 | South Africa | Unregulated | 90+ complaints, no protection |
Safe Alternatives: Trusted Brokers with High WikiFX Scores
While the above brokers raise serious red flags, there are reliable alternatives that have strong regulatory oversight and positive reputations among traders. Here are some safer options:
- IG Group – FCA-regulated, long-established broker with a wide range of products and professional-grade platforms.
- Saxo Bank – A fully regulated broker under the Danish FSA, known for transparency and high-quality research.
- CMC Markets – FCA-regulated broker offering advanced trading tools and strong customer protection.
- Exness – A global broker regulated by multiple authorities, with transparent pricing and quick withdrawals.
If youre a beginner, you might also want to read our guide on how to choose a forex broker.
Final Thoughts: Protect Your Funds Before Its Too Late
Your funds deserve a safe and regulated trading environment. Dont fall victim to brokers that could endanger your investments. The brokers listed above may appear legitimate on the surface, but low WikiFX ratings, lack of transparency, and a history of complaints are strong warning signs.
We suggest you:
- Verify licenses directly with financial regulators.
- Research broker reviews and complaint histories.
- Avoid depositing large sums into suspicious or offshore entities.

Disclaimer:
The views in this article only represent the author's personal views, and do not constitute investment advice on this platform. This platform does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness and timeliness of the information in the article, and will not be liable for any loss caused by the use of or reliance on the information in the article.
Read more

Scandinavian Capital Markets Exposed: Traders Cry Foul Play Over Trade Manipulation & Fund Scams
Does Scandinavian Capital Markets stipulate heavy margin requirements to keep you out of positions? Have you been deceived by their price manipulation tactic? Have you lost all your investments as the broker did not have risk management in place? Were you persuaded to bet on too risky and scam-ridden instruments by the broker officials? These are some burning issues traders face here. In this Scandinavian Capital Markets review guide, we have discussed these issues. Read on to explore them.

Deriv Withdrawal Issues: Real Client Cases Exposed
Deriv exposed via client cases of withdrawal issues, 13‑month refund delays, severe slippage, and disabled accounts despite multiple “regulated” licenses.

Uniglobe Markets Deposits and Withdrawals Explained: A Data-Driven Analysis for Traders
For any experienced trader, the integrity of a broker isn't just measured in pips and spreads; it's fundamentally defined by the reliability and transparency of its financial operations. The ability to deposit and, more importantly, withdraw capital seamlessly is the bedrock of trust between a trader and their brokerage. When this process is fraught with delays, ambiguity, or outright failure, it undermines the entire trading relationship. This in-depth analysis focuses on Uniglobe Markets, a broker that has been operational for 5-10 years and presents itself as a world-class trading partner. We will move beyond the marketing claims to scrutinize the realities of its funding mechanisms. By examining available data on Uniglobe Markets deposits and withdrawals, we aim to provide a clear, evidence-based picture for traders evaluating this broker for long-term engagement. Our investigation will be anchored primarily in verified records and user exposure reports to explain the Uniglobe Mar

In-Depth Review of Uniglobe Markets Trading Conditions and Account Types – An Analysis for Traders
For experienced traders, selecting a broker is a meticulous process that extends far beyond headline spreads and bonus offers. It involves a deep dive into the fundamental structure of a broker's offering: its regulatory standing, the integrity of its trading conditions, and the flexibility of its account types. Uniglobe Markets, a broker with an operational history spanning over five years, presents a complex case study. It offers seemingly attractive conditions, including high leverage and a diverse account structure, yet operates within a regulatory framework that demands intense scrutiny. This in-depth analysis will dissect the Uniglobe Markets trading conditions and account types, using data primarily sourced from the global broker inquiry platform, WikiFX. We will explore the Uniglobe Markets minimum deposit, leverage, and account types to provide a clear, data-driven perspective for traders evaluating this broker as a potential long-term partner.
