점수
JaneStreet
https://www.janestreet.com/
공식 사이트
평점 지수
영향력
영향력
A
영향력 지수 NO.1
연락처
싱글 코어
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 이 브로커의 현장 조사 나쁜 평가 수는 2개에 달했습니다. 위험과 잠재적인 사기에 유의하시기 바랍니다!
JaneStreet 을(를) 본 사용자는 또다시 열람했습니다...
Vantage
fpmarkets
GTCFX
EC Markets
검색 소스
노출 언어
시장 분석
소재 노출
웹사이트 감정
janestreet.com
52.73.180.213서버 위치미국
ICP 등록번호--주요 방문 국가/지역--도메인 생성 날짜0001-01-01웹사이트 이름WHOIS.GANDI.NET회사GANDI SAS
관계 계보
관련 기업
회사 소개
| JaneStreet 리뷰 요약 | |
| 설립 | 2000 |
| 등록 국가/지역 | 미국 |
| 규제 | SFC에 의해 홍콩에서 규제 (라이선스 번호 BAL548)를 받음; 영국의 FCA 라이선스 (번호 486546)는 현재 "초과"로 표시됨 |
| 제품 및 서비스 | 마켓 메이킹, ETF, 채권, 주식, 옵션, 양적 연구, 기술 솔루션 |
| 거래 플랫폼 | 자체 거래 시스템, OCaml 기반 소프트웨어 |
| 고객 지원 | 뉴욕: +1 646 759 6000 |
| 런던: +44 (0)20 3787 3200 | |
| 홍콩: +852 3900 7300 | |
| 암스테르담: +31 (0)20 794 3100 | |
| 싱가포르: +65 6393 6000 | |
| 미디어: media@janestreet.com | |
JaneStreet 정보
Jane Street은 2000년부터 운영되고 있는 미국의 개인 소유의 유동성 제공 업체 및 양적 거래 기업입니다. 이 회사는 선물 시장 기술 혁신, 양적 연구 및 상장 지수 펀드(ETF)에 중점을 둡니다. 이 회사는 소매 거래를 위한 것이 아니며, MT4 또는 MT5와 같은 공개 서비스나 플랫폼이 없습니다.

장단점
| 장점 | 단점 |
| SFC에 의해 홍콩에서 규제 | 소매 또는 개인 투자자를 위한 것이 아님 |
| 전 세계 200개 이상의 전자 거래 장소에서 운영 | MT4/MT5 또는 전통적인 거래 계정을 지원하지 않음 |
| 양적 전략 및 자체 기술 스택에 대한 강력한 전문 지식 | 영국의 FCA 라이선스는 "초과"로 표시됨 (비활성화됨) |
JaneStreet의 신뢰성
Jane Street은 홍콩의 Securities and Futures Commission (SFC)에 의해 선물 계약 거래를 위한 BAL548 라이선스 번호로 규제 받고 있습니다. 영국에서는 Financial Conduct Authority (FCA)에 의해 투자 자문 서비스를 위한 486546 라이선스 번호로 등록되었으나 현재 "초과" 상태이므로 더 이상 활동하지 않습니다.


제품 및 서비스
Jane Street는 혁신적인 기술 서비스, 양적 연구 및 거래의 혼합을 제공합니다. 200개 이상의 전자 거래 장소에서 운영되며, 기계 학습 기반의 양적 전략, 주식, 채권, 옵션 및 ETF에 대한 뛰어난 능력으로 알려진 세계적인 유동성 공급자입니다.
| 카테고리 | 제공되는 제품/서비스 |
| 거래 | ETF, 주식, 채권, 옵션 및 기타 자산 클래스에서 200개 이상의 장소에서 시장 제작 |
| 양적 연구 | 기계 학습 기반의 모델 개발, 전략 설계, 대규모 데이터 분석 |
| 기술 | OCaml을 사용한 내부 소프트웨어 및 인프라 (예: 거래, 리스크, 분석 도구) |
| 글로벌 존재감 | 뉴욕, 런던, 홍콩, 싱가포르, 암스테르담에서 운영 |
| 협업 | 거래, 연구 및 기술 팀의 교차 기능 통합으로 시장 문제 해결에 임함 |

회사 사무실
Jane Street는 뉴욕, 런던, 홍콩, 싱가포르, 암스테르담 및 시카고 등 세계에서 가장 역동적인 금융 중심지에 사무실을 운영합니다.

거래 플랫폼
| 거래 플랫폼 | 지원 | 사용 가능한 장치 | 어떤 유형의 트레이더에 적합한가 |
| 내부 거래 시스템 | ✔ | 데스크톱 | 전용 전략을 사용하는 기관 트레이더 |
| OCaml 기반 소프트웨어 | ✔ | 데스크톱 | 양적 개발자 및 기술 중심의 거래 팀 |
| MT4/MT5 | ❌ | – | - |

키워드
- 10-15년
- 홍콩에 규제
- 영국에 규제
- Dealing in futures contracts
- 투자 컨설턴트 허가증
- 글로벌 업무
- 오버실링 경영 의심
- 잠재적 위험성이 높음
위키 Q&A
Is it possible to trade commodities such as Gold (XAU/USD) and Crude Oil through JaneStreet?
Based on my experience as an independent trader and a careful review of the information about JaneStreet, I must approach this with extra caution due to its unique business model. JaneStreet is not designed as a traditional retail brokerage platform; rather, it is an institutional liquidity provider and quantitative trading firm. They operate on over 200 electronic venues globally, focusing on market making in products like ETFs, equities, bonds, options, and futures. However, there is no direct evidence or indication that they specifically facilitate retail trading of commodities like Gold (XAU/USD) or Crude Oil for individual clients. Further, JaneStreet lacks traditional retail platforms such as MT4 or MT5, and does not support common public account types. Their technology is primarily proprietary and designed for institutional participants, not for standard retail access. While their institutional activities may involve trading commodities indirectly via ETFs or derivatives on global exchanges, private retail traders—including myself—would not be able to access or trade commodities like Gold or Crude Oil directly through JaneStreet. In my view, JaneStreet is not an appropriate choice for retail commodity trading, and I would advise seeking out a retail-focused, well-regulated broker if your aim is to trade instruments such as XAU/USD or Crude Oil more directly and transparently.
Does JaneStreet impose any fees when you deposit or withdraw funds?
From my direct analysis and experience as a trader, it’s important to clarify that JaneStreet isn’t set up as a typical retail forex broker where deposit and withdrawal processes are straightforward or relevant. JaneStreet is a large-scale liquidity provider and quantitative trading firm focused on institutional and technical market-making activities, as outlined by its regulatory profile in Hong Kong and inactive license status in the UK. The core of its business is not structured for individual or retail traders, and there aren’t any public-facing platforms or accounts, such as MT4 or MT5, through which typical funding transactions would take place. Given this structure, questions about deposit or withdrawal fees in the retail broker sense simply don’t apply to JaneStreet. There’s no retail onboarding, no personal trading accounts, and no client-facing portal for routine deposits or withdrawals. Any fund movement would be managed through negotiated institutional relationships, not a standardized client service interface where transparent retail fees could be published or charged. For me, as someone always vigilant about fees and transparency, this absence alone indicates that JaneStreet is not an option for those seeking the typical account funding experience found at traditional forex brokers. Anyone considering engagement should be highly cautious and understand that JaneStreet serves a completely different segment of the financial industry.
How do JaneStreet's swap fees (overnight financing charges) stack up against those offered by other brokers?
As an experienced forex trader, it’s crucial for me to assess all operational aspects of a broker—swap fees included—before considering serious engagement. In the case of JaneStreet, it’s important to clarify that the firm fundamentally differs from the typical retail forex brokers with which most traders are familiar. JaneStreet operates primarily as a global liquidity provider and quantitative trading enterprise, focusing on futures, ETFs, bonds, and other institutional-grade instruments. There’s no support for traditional retail trading platforms like MT4 or MT5, nor does JaneStreet offer conventional trading accounts or products directly accessible to individuals. Given this institutional structure, JaneStreet doesn’t publicly list swap fees or overnight financing charges as one would expect from retail forex brokers. In my experience, these costs, when present at the institutional level, are generally embedded within specific contract terms or reflected through negotiated arrangements with counterparties—not through standardized, transparent charges that individual traders can benchmark. Without retail account offerings or published fee schedules, it’s not possible to directly compare JaneStreet’s swap rates to those of retail-focused brokers. For traders like myself seeking transparency and cost predictability in overnight financing, brokers with explicit retail services and clear swaps documentation are preferable. If knowing and comparing swap rates is a priority in my decision-making, the absence of this detail at JaneStreet means it’s not a suitable broker for my typical retail or even advanced personal trading needs. Always, caution and verification of costs remain essential, especially with institutionally focused firms.
Does JaneStreet charge a commission per lot on their ECN or raw spread account types?
From my experience and based strictly on the available context, JaneStreet is fundamentally different from typical forex brokers that cater to retail traders. Unlike brokers offering ECN or raw spread accounts—which usually charge commissions per lot traded—JaneStreet does not appear to have such account structures or pricing mechanisms. This firm is a large, institutional liquidity provider and quantitative trading company. Their operations focus on market making and proprietary quantitative strategies across various asset classes, including equities, bonds, options, and ETFs, primarily for institutions and not individual investors. There is no mention in the public information of ECN or raw spread accounts, nor of any standard commission-per-lot model. Their technology stack is in-house and designed for their proprietary use; they do not support widely-used retail trading platforms like MT4 or MT5. Because of this structure, standard fee schedules are unlikely to apply the way they do for retail brokers, making it essential to highlight that individual traders would not interact with JaneStreet in the conventional account/commission sense. For me, as someone who often looks for transparent fee information before using any new platform, the absence of these details—and the very nature of JaneStreet's business—would mean they are not a viable option for retail trading, and there should be no expectation of familiar forex commission models. As always, I urge anyone considering a firm to thoroughly understand its target clients, regulation, and business model before proceeding, as the risks and access may not be appropriate for individual portfolio needs.
사용자리뷰 2
댓글을 달고 싶은 내용
입력해 주세요....
