天眼评分
OMEGA
https://www.omegainvest.com.cy/
官方网址
评分指数
影响力
影响力
D
影响力指数 NO.1
联系方式
持牌机构:Omega Funds Investment Ltd
监管证号:102/09
单核
1G
40G
1M*ADSL
- 该交易商WikiFX实勘差评已达到1条,请注意风险,谨防受害!
浏览 OMEGA 的用户还浏览了..
AVATRADE
官网鉴定
omegainvest.com.cy
195.14.130.20服务器所在地塞浦路斯
备案号--主要访问国家/地区--域名创建时间--网站名称--所属公司--
关系族谱
相关企业
公司简介
| OMEGA 评论摘要 | |
| 成立时间 | 2008 |
| 注册国家/地区 | 塞浦路斯 |
| 监管 | CYSEC监管 |
| 市场工具 | 证券、货币、期权和期货 |
| 模拟账户 | / |
| 杠杆 | / |
| 点差 | / |
| 交易平台 | WTS(IB)和开放交易S交易平台 |
| 最低存款 | / |
| 客户支持 | 传真:+357 25028929 |
| 电话:+357 25028920 | |
| 邮箱:info@omegainvest.com | |
| 地址:塞浦路斯利马索尔阿吉奥斯阿塔纳西奥斯4105号,特鲁多斯街2号,克塞诺斯大厦202办公室 | |
OMEGA 信息
OMEGA 是一家成立于2008年的受监管经纪商。注册于塞浦路斯,OMEGA 在CYSEC的监管下运营,在WTS(IB)和开放交易S平台上提供投资服务、附属服务和金融工具。

优缺点
| 优点 | 缺点 |
| 监管良好 | 没有MT4/MT5平台 |
| 运营时间长 | 监管地址与实际地址不匹配 |
| 多种联系渠道 | 交易条件信息有限 |
| 多样化的服务和产品 |
OMEGA 是否合法?
OMEGA 资金投资有限公司在CySEC的监管下持有做市商(MM)许可证编号102/09。
| 监管国家 | 监管机构 | 当前状态 | 受监管实体 | 许可证类型 | 许可证编号 |
| 塞浦路斯 | 塞浦路斯证券交易委员会(CySEC) | 受监管 | 欧米茄资金投资有限公司 | 做市商(MM) | 102/09 |

WikiFX 实地调查
WikiFX 实地调查团队访问了OMEGA在塞浦路斯的地址。我们发现其实际地址与监管地址不符。请注意风险!

我可以在OMEGA上交易什么?
经纪商提供投资服务、附属服务以及金融工具,如证券、货币、期权和期货。
| 交易资产 | 支持 |
| 证券 | ✔ |
| 货币 | ✔ |
| 期权 | ✔ |
| 期货 | ✔ |
| 大宗商品 | ❌ |
| 指数 | ❌ |
| 股票 | ❌ |
| 加密货币 | ❌ |
| 债券 | ❌ |
| 交易所交易基金 | ❌ |


账户类型
Omega为不同客户群体提供定制的账户类型:零售客户、专业客户或合格交易对手。但具体账户特点尚未披露。

交易平台
OMEGA为其客户提供两种不同的交易平台:WTS (IB)和开放交易S。
| 交易平台 | 支持 |
| WTS (IB) | ✔ |
| 开放交易S | ✔ |

企业画像
- 15-20年
- 塞浦路斯监管
- 全牌照(MM)
- 展业区域存疑
- 高级风险隐患
Wiki问答
Can I trust OMEGA as a reliable and secure broker for my trading needs?
Having traded independently for over a decade, I’ve learned to approach any broker with careful scrutiny, especially where my funds and data are concerned. With OMEGA, a few points stand out. The broker is regulated by CySEC in Cyprus and has been operating for more than 15 years, which does provide a measure of credibility and stability compared to unregulated entities. I do value regulatory oversight because it generally means some level of investor protection and accountability, but Cyprus regulation is not viewed as strict as some of the more established regulators in other jurisdictions. That said, my caution is heightened by WikiFX’s note regarding a mismatch between OMEGA’s regulatory and actual business addresses—a factor that can signal administrative inconsistencies or insufficient transparency. For me, physical transparency is important as it reflects a broker’s genuine intention to serve clients rather than avoid oversight. Additionally, OMEGA does not offer popular trading platforms like MT4 or MT5, only supporting WTS (IB) and OTS, which could complicate seamless integration with my existing workflows or trading tools. There’s also limited information available publicly on spreads, leverage, or trading conditions, making it difficult for me to fully evaluate the broker’s costs and suitability for my strategies. In my experience, while OMEGA’s long regulatory track record and product diversity (currencies, options, futures, and securities) are pluses, the combination of a suspicious business scope alert and lack of transparency in core trading details does make me hesitant. Personally, I would not commit significant capital until I had greater clarity and had directly tested their platforms and support. For those who value security and openness as highly as I do, proceeding cautiously and continuing to monitor for updates is prudent.
How high can the leverage go with OMEGA for major forex pairs, and does the leverage differ for other types of assets?
In my detailed research on OMEGA, I found that the broker does not disclose specific details regarding leverage for major forex pairs or other asset classes. This lack of transparency is concerning to me, as leverage policies critically impact both potential profits and, more importantly, the risks traders assume. With OMEGA being regulated by CySEC, my expectation would be that leverage should align with European Union requirements—typically, this means a maximum of 1:30 for retail clients trading major FX pairs. However, since OMEGA offers different account categories such as Retail, Professional, or Eligible Counterparties, it's possible that higher leverage could be available for those who qualify as professional clients, though again, these terms are not detailed. For me, the absence of clear leverage information, especially regarding instruments beyond forex like options and futures, significantly limits my confidence in fully evaluating their risk environment. I strongly believe that understanding leverage terms—and how they might differ across asset classes—is essential for prudent risk management, especially when considering a broker flagged for having a suspicious business scope and high potential risk by industry watchlists. Until OMEGA publicly outlines their leverage conditions for each asset type, I would remain cautious and thoroughly seek clarification from their support before considering opening an account.
How do the different account types provided by OMEGA compare to each other?
Having traded with a variety of brokers over the years, I always pay special attention to account types and how transparently they’re presented. With OMEGA, while it’s clear that accounts are tailored for three groups—Retail Clients, Professional Clients, and Eligible Counterparties—the lack of detailed information on specific account features stands out to me. For me, this makes it challenging to make a direct, informed comparison between the accounts, especially compared to brokers that layout minimum deposit requirements, spreads, leverage, or specific benefits for each tier upfront. This limited transparency requires a cautious approach. I know from my experience that understanding precise account parameters—like trading costs or margin requirements—is essential for effective risk management and strategy planning. OMEGA does specify that it’s regulated by CySEC and that it offers standard financial instruments, which provides some reassurance about oversight, but without clear account specifics, I feel obligated to treat the offerings conservatively. In summary, while the segregation into client categories suggests an attempt to meet varying trader needs, the lack of public detail means, for me, that I would need to directly contact OMEGA or request further documentation to make any meaningful account comparison—and I'd be careful before making any commitments.
Are there any inactivity fees charged by OMEGA, and if they do apply, under what circumstances are they imposed?
Based on my thorough review of the available information about OMEGA, I was unable to find any mention of inactivity fees or the specific circumstances under which such charges might apply. As a trader who has evaluated many brokers over the years, I know that details on fees—especially less obvious ones like inactivity fees—can significantly impact a trading experience and the overall cost of maintaining an account. Often, reputable brokers will clearly outline potential charges in their account terms or fee schedules. In OMEGA’s case, the lack of transparency regarding trading conditions, including fees, stands out for me as a point of caution. In my own practice, I always seek full clarity on fee structures before committing to a broker, as hidden fees can erode profits over time. While OMEGA is regulated by CySEC, which usually imposes certain standards for disclosure, I could not locate any direct answers about inactivity fees from the publicly available materials. Without explicit confirmation, I would avoid making assumptions and instead recommend contacting OMEGA’s customer support directly for clarification before opening an account. Taking this cautious approach is, in my experience, essential when dealing with any potential unknowns, particularly with financial service providers.
用户评价 1
你要评价的内容
请输入...

